Home / Compare / Comparison

Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist vs Medical Technologist

Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.

This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist, which currently counts 25 enrolled providers across 11 U.S. states and territories, and Medical Technologist, with 738 providers across 48 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist or Medical Technologist rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.

On national volume, Medical Technologist carries the larger provider roster (738 vs 25), and Medical Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 48 states versus 11. The top Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist concentration sits in Texas (11 providers), while Medical Technologist peaks in Puerto Rico (103). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.

Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist and Medical Technologist are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.

Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology

25
Providers
11
States
View specialty →

Medical Technologist

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology

738
Providers
48
States
View specialty →

Top 5 States — Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist

Texas 11
Florida 3
Georgia 2
Missouri 2
Arkansas 1

Top 5 States — Medical Technologist

Puerto Rico 103
Georgia 96
Florida 55
Texas 50
California 31

How do these providers compare by location?

State Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist Medical Technologist
Georgia 2 96
Texas 11 50
Florida 3 55
California 0 31
North Dakota 0 27
North Carolina 1 24
South Carolina 0 25
Colorado 0 23
Montana 0 21
Arizona 1 18
Illinois 0 16
New York 0 16
South Dakota 0 15
Washington 0 15
Ohio 0 14
Oregon 1 12
Wyoming 0 13
Minnesota 0 12
Louisiana 0 10
Iowa 0 9
Kansas 0 9
Michigan 0 9
New Mexico 0 9
Alabama 0 8
Indiana 0 8
Pennsylvania 0 8
Arkansas 1 6
Massachusetts 0 7
Nevada 1 6
Tennessee 1 6
Virginia 0 7
Connecticut 0 6
New Jersey 0 6
Mississippi 1 4
Missouri 2 3
Kentucky 0 4
Maryland 0 4
District of Columbia 0 4
Alaska 0 3
Nebraska 0 3
Oklahoma 0 3
Wisconsin 0 3
Vermont 0 2
West Virginia 0 2
Idaho 0 1
Maine 0 1
Utah 0 1

Summary

Medical Technologist has more registered providers nationally (738 vs 25). Medical Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 48 states.

Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.

See all Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist providers in Texas →

FAQ

How many Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist providers are there vs Medical Technologist?
There are 25 Blood Banking Specialist/Technologist providers and 738 Medical Technologist providers registered in the CMS NPPES directory.
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage?
Medical Technologist has broader coverage with 48 states vs 11 states.
Where is the data from?
Provider counts are from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates.

Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.