Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist vs Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular
Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.
This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist, which currently counts 86 enrolled providers across 23 U.S. states and territories, and Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular, with 351 providers across 45 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist or Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.
On national volume, Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular carries the larger provider roster (351 vs 86), and Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular has the wider geographic footprint at 45 states versus 23. The top Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist concentration sits in Colorado (37 providers), while Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular peaks in California (53). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.
Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist and Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.
Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular
Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular
Category: Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular
Top 5 States — Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist
Top 5 States — Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular
How do these providers compare by location?
| State | Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist | Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular |
|---|---|---|
| Florida | 7 | 52 |
| California | 2 | 53 |
| Texas | 8 | 33 |
| Colorado | 37 | 3 |
| Minnesota | 1 | 18 |
| New York | 0 | 16 |
| Ohio | 3 | 13 |
| Illinois | 0 | 15 |
| Arizona | 0 | 12 |
| New Jersey | 2 | 10 |
| North Carolina | 2 | 10 |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | 10 |
| Washington | 3 | 8 |
| Maryland | 1 | 8 |
| Georgia | 1 | 7 |
| Tennessee | 3 | 5 |
| Louisiana | 0 | 7 |
| Michigan | 1 | 6 |
| Massachusetts | 1 | 5 |
| Mississippi | 0 | 6 |
| Kentucky | 3 | 2 |
| Nebraska | 1 | 4 |
| Connecticut | 0 | 4 |
| South Carolina | 0 | 4 |
| Utah | 2 | 2 |
| Virginia | 2 | 2 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 3 |
| Nevada | 0 | 3 |
| New Mexico | 0 | 3 |
| Oklahoma | 0 | 3 |
| South Dakota | 1 | 2 |
| Alabama | 0 | 2 |
| Idaho | 0 | 2 |
| Indiana | 1 | 1 |
| Iowa | 0 | 2 |
| Kansas | 0 | 2 |
| Missouri | 0 | 2 |
| West Virginia | 0 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 0 | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 | 0 |
| Hawaii | 0 | 1 |
| Montana | 0 | 1 |
| Oregon | 0 | 1 |
| Wyoming | 0 | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | 1 |
Summary
Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular has more registered providers nationally (351 vs 86). Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular has broader geographic coverage across 45 states.
Related Comparisons
Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.
See all Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist providers in Colorado →
FAQ
How many Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist/Technologist providers are there vs Sonography Specialist/Technologist Cardiovascular? ▼
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage? ▼
Where is the data from? ▼
Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.