Hemapheresis Practitioner vs Medical Technologist

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.

This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Hemapheresis Practitioner, which currently counts 1 enrolled providers across 1 U.S. states and territories, and Medical Technologist, with 738 providers across 48 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Hemapheresis Practitioner or Medical Technologist rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field, dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first. Every figure is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES) - more than 7 million providers, maintained since May 2007, with 2023 Medicare Part D data, and, according to CMS, can be searched, compared, and traced in our methodology.

On national volume, Medical Technologist carries the larger provider roster (738 vs 1), and Medical Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 48 states versus 1. The top Hemapheresis Practitioner concentration sits in Texas (1 providers), while Medical Technologist peaks in Puerto Rico (103). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second, a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.

Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability - Hemapheresis Practitioner and Medical Technologist are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.

Hemapheresis Practitioner

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology

1
Providers
1
States
View specialty →

Medical Technologist

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology

738
Providers
48
States
View specialty →

Top 5 States - Hemapheresis Practitioner

Texas 1

Top 5 States - Medical Technologist

Puerto Rico 103
Georgia 96
Florida 55
Texas 50
California 31

How do these providers compare by location?

State Hemapheresis Practitioner Medical Technologist
Georgia 0 96
Florida 0 55
Texas 1 50
California 0 31
North Dakota 0 27
South Carolina 0 25
North Carolina 0 24
Colorado 0 23
Montana 0 21
Arizona 0 18
Illinois 0 16
New York 0 16
South Dakota 0 15
Washington 0 15
Ohio 0 14
Wyoming 0 13
Minnesota 0 12
Oregon 0 12
Louisiana 0 10
Iowa 0 9
Kansas 0 9
Michigan 0 9
New Mexico 0 9
Alabama 0 8
Indiana 0 8
Pennsylvania 0 8
Massachusetts 0 7
Virginia 0 7
Arkansas 0 6
Connecticut 0 6
Nevada 0 6
New Jersey 0 6
Tennessee 0 6
Kentucky 0 4
Maryland 0 4
Mississippi 0 4
District of Columbia 0 4
Alaska 0 3
Missouri 0 3
Nebraska 0 3
Oklahoma 0 3
Wisconsin 0 3
Vermont 0 2
West Virginia 0 2
Idaho 0 1
Maine 0 1
Utah 0 1

Summary

Medical Technologist has more registered providers nationally (738 vs 1). Medical Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 48 states.

Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison, all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.

See all Hemapheresis Practitioner providers in Texas →

FAQ

How many Hemapheresis Practitioner providers are there vs Medical Technologist?
There are 1 Hemapheresis Practitioner providers and 738 Medical Technologist providers registered in the CMS NPPES directory.
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage?
Medical Technologist has broader coverage with 48 states vs 1 states.
Where is the data from?
Provider counts are from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates.

Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-05-20.