Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist vs Medical Technologist
Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.
This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist, which currently counts 14 enrolled providers across 10 U.S. states and territories, and Medical Technologist, with 738 providers across 48 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist or Medical Technologist rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.
On national volume, Medical Technologist carries the larger provider roster (738 vs 14), and Medical Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 48 states versus 10. The top Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist concentration sits in Missouri (3 providers), while Medical Technologist peaks in Puerto Rico (103). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.
Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist and Medical Technologist are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.
Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology
Medical Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology
Top 5 States — Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist
Top 5 States — Medical Technologist
How do these providers compare by location?
| State | Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist | Medical Technologist |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 1 | 96 |
| Florida | 1 | 55 |
| Texas | 1 | 50 |
| California | 1 | 31 |
| North Dakota | 0 | 27 |
| South Carolina | 0 | 25 |
| North Carolina | 0 | 24 |
| Colorado | 0 | 23 |
| Montana | 0 | 21 |
| Arizona | 0 | 18 |
| Illinois | 0 | 16 |
| New York | 0 | 16 |
| Ohio | 1 | 14 |
| South Dakota | 0 | 15 |
| Washington | 0 | 15 |
| Wyoming | 0 | 13 |
| Minnesota | 0 | 12 |
| Oregon | 0 | 12 |
| Kansas | 1 | 9 |
| Louisiana | 0 | 10 |
| Iowa | 0 | 9 |
| Michigan | 0 | 9 |
| New Mexico | 0 | 9 |
| Alabama | 0 | 8 |
| Indiana | 0 | 8 |
| Pennsylvania | 0 | 8 |
| Tennessee | 2 | 6 |
| Massachusetts | 0 | 7 |
| Virginia | 0 | 7 |
| Arkansas | 0 | 6 |
| Connecticut | 0 | 6 |
| Maryland | 2 | 4 |
| Missouri | 3 | 3 |
| Nevada | 0 | 6 |
| New Jersey | 0 | 6 |
| Kentucky | 0 | 4 |
| Mississippi | 0 | 4 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | 4 |
| Alaska | 0 | 3 |
| Nebraska | 0 | 3 |
| Oklahoma | 0 | 3 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | 3 |
| Vermont | 0 | 2 |
| West Virginia | 0 | 2 |
| Idaho | 0 | 1 |
| Maine | 0 | 1 |
| Rhode Island | 1 | 0 |
| Utah | 0 | 1 |
Summary
Medical Technologist has more registered providers nationally (738 vs 14). Medical Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 48 states.
Related Comparisons
Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.
See all Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist providers in Missouri →
FAQ
How many Immunology Pathology Specialist/Technologist providers are there vs Medical Technologist? ▼
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage? ▼
Where is the data from? ▼
Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.