Medical Technologist vs Microbiology Specialist/Technologist
Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.
This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Medical Technologist, which currently counts 738 enrolled providers across 48 U.S. states and territories, and Microbiology Specialist/Technologist, with 67 providers across 20 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Medical Technologist or Microbiology Specialist/Technologist rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.
On national volume, Medical Technologist carries the larger provider roster (738 vs 67), and Medical Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 48 states versus 20. The top Medical Technologist concentration sits in Puerto Rico (103 providers), while Microbiology Specialist/Technologist peaks in California (17). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.
Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Medical Technologist and Microbiology Specialist/Technologist are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.
Medical Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology
Microbiology Specialist/Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Pathology
Top 5 States — Medical Technologist
Top 5 States — Microbiology Specialist/Technologist
How do these providers compare by location?
| State | Medical Technologist | Microbiology Specialist/Technologist |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 96 | 4 |
| Texas | 50 | 17 |
| Florida | 55 | 1 |
| California | 31 | 17 |
| North Dakota | 27 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 24 | 1 |
| South Carolina | 25 | 0 |
| Colorado | 23 | 1 |
| Montana | 21 | 0 |
| New York | 16 | 4 |
| Ohio | 14 | 6 |
| Arizona | 18 | 0 |
| Washington | 15 | 2 |
| Illinois | 16 | 0 |
| South Dakota | 15 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 12 | 1 |
| Wyoming | 13 | 0 |
| Oregon | 12 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | 4 |
| Louisiana | 10 | 0 |
| Michigan | 9 | 1 |
| Alabama | 8 | 1 |
| Iowa | 9 | 0 |
| Kansas | 9 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 9 | 0 |
| Indiana | 8 | 0 |
| Massachusetts | 7 | 1 |
| Nevada | 6 | 1 |
| New Jersey | 6 | 1 |
| Tennessee | 6 | 1 |
| Virginia | 7 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 6 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 6 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 4 | 1 |
| Kentucky | 4 | 0 |
| Maryland | 4 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 4 | 0 |
| Alaska | 3 | 0 |
| Missouri | 3 | 0 |
| Nebraska | 3 | 0 |
| Oklahoma | 3 | 0 |
| Vermont | 2 | 1 |
| West Virginia | 2 | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 3 | 0 |
| Idaho | 1 | 0 |
| Maine | 1 | 0 |
| Utah | 1 | 0 |
Summary
Medical Technologist has more registered providers nationally (738 vs 67). Medical Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 48 states.
Related Comparisons
Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.
FAQ
How many Medical Technologist providers are there vs Microbiology Specialist/Technologist? ▼
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage? ▼
Where is the data from? ▼
Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.