Research Study Abstracter/Coder vs Specialist
Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.
This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Research Study Abstracter/Coder, which currently counts 113 enrolled providers across 33 U.S. states and territories, and Specialist, with 69,608 providers across 55 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Research Study Abstracter/Coder or Specialist rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.
On national volume, Specialist carries the larger provider roster (69,608 vs 113), and Specialist has the wider geographic footprint at 55 states versus 33. The top Research Study Abstracter/Coder concentration sits in California (44 providers), while Specialist peaks in New York (22,821). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.
Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Research Study Abstracter/Coder and Specialist are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.
Top 5 States — Research Study Abstracter/Coder
Top 5 States — Specialist
Geographic Comparison
| State | Research Study Abstracter/Coder | Specialist |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 6 | 22,821 |
| California | 44 | 6,672 |
| Florida | 7 | 3,485 |
| Washington | 4 | 2,868 |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | 2,470 |
| Texas | 4 | 2,421 |
| New Jersey | 1 | 1,996 |
| Ohio | 1 | 1,568 |
| Illinois | 0 | 1,443 |
| Colorado | 1 | 1,286 |
| Massachusetts | 1 | 1,274 |
| Oregon | 0 | 1,202 |
| Georgia | 2 | 1,177 |
| Maryland | 1 | 1,138 |
| North Carolina | 2 | 1,131 |
| New Hampshire | 0 | 1,056 |
| Michigan | 2 | 1,016 |
| Virginia | 0 | 1,017 |
| Arizona | 0 | 975 |
| Tennessee | 1 | 944 |
| Minnesota | 3 | 914 |
| Louisiana | 2 | 711 |
| Alabama | 1 | 646 |
| Arkansas | 4 | 598 |
| Kentucky | 0 | 553 |
| Indiana | 5 | 540 |
| Missouri | 1 | 543 |
| Connecticut | 2 | 523 |
| South Carolina | 0 | 497 |
| Oklahoma | 0 | 480 |
| Utah | 1 | 442 |
| New Mexico | 1 | 438 |
| Hawaii | 1 | 374 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 339 |
| Nevada | 3 | 326 |
| West Virginia | 2 | 291 |
| Mississippi | 0 | 281 |
| Kansas | 1 | 277 |
| Maine | 0 | 271 |
| North Dakota | 0 | 240 |
| Rhode Island | 0 | 231 |
| Idaho | 1 | 210 |
| Nebraska | 0 | 197 |
| District of Columbia | 1 | 181 |
| Iowa | 0 | 160 |
| Delaware | 0 | 152 |
| Montana | 1 | 145 |
| Alaska | 0 | 142 |
| Vermont | 0 | 74 |
| Wyoming | 0 | 62 |
| South Dakota | 0 | 55 |
Summary
Specialist has more registered providers nationally (69,608 vs 113). Specialist has broader geographic coverage across 55 states.
Related Comparisons
Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.
See all Research Study Abstracter/Coder providers in California →
FAQ
How many Research Study Abstracter/Coder providers are there vs Specialist? ▼
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage? ▼
Where is the data from? ▼
Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.