2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1821657388 FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Reber, FNP-C

Nurse Practitioner in Fargo, North Dakota. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
180
Medicare Part D claims · 143 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
72%
generic claims · 28% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
83/100
▼ 0 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Amanda Reber, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 180 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

83/100
MIPS score · 0 vs avg
180
Part D claims, 2023
72%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Amanda Reber, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

83 39th percentile higher than 39% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Reber, FNP-C sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Reber, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 32% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 43% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Amanda Reber, FNP-C — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Reber, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Amanda Reber, FNP-C?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/10/2019

NPI 1821657388

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

180 83% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

83/100 0.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in North Dakota

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among North Dakota providers

North Dakota providers

Largest specialties in North Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Personal Care Attendant — 7.3%Personal Care Attendant7.3%Case Manager/Care Coordinator — 6.4%Case Manager/Care Coordinator6.4%Physical Therapist — 4.7%Physical Therapist4.7%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.6%Speech-Language Pathologist4.6%Registered Nurse — 4.2%Registered Nurse4.2%Social Worker — 4.1%Social Worker4.1%Nurse Practitioner — 1.8%Nurse Practitioner1.8%
Largest specialties in North Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Amanda Reber, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 83/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%83%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 83/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Amanda Reber, FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP-C credentials at 1720 UNIVERSITY DR S, Fargo, ND, 58103, with a listed phone of (701) 234-2000. NPI 1821657388 was issued on 06/10/2019. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Reber most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 180 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 143 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $17K in drug spend, split 28% brand-name and 72% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 83/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 87.1, Cost 57.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1720 UNIVERSITY DR S
Fargo, ND 58103

Provider Details

NPI 1821657388
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/10/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.9973
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
87.0681
Quality
57.0897
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Amanda Reber, FNP-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Sanford Medical Center Fargo
★★★★☆ 4/5
West Fargo, ND
Acute Care Hospitals
CMS CCN: 350011

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Amanda Reber, FNP-C — brand share 28.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

28% brand-name claims vs 72% generic, on 180 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

180
Total Claims
$17K
Total Drug Cost
143
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
185
Total Day Supply
2,520
Brand vs Generic
28% brand / 72% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$14K
Generic Drug Cost
$3K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.06
Gender Split
69% female / 31% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Amanda Reber, FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
47
Eliquis
Apixaban
43
Enoxaparin Sodium
19
Omeprazole
19

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Amanda Reber, FNP-C fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Reber, FNP-C's 180 claims are below the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in North Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in North Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Reber.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the North Dakota medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Reber, FNP-C's specialty?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Fargo, North Dakota. Credentials: FNP-C.
How much does Amanda Reber, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Amanda Reber, FNP-C wrote 180 Medicare Part D claims totaling $17K in drug costs for 143 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Reber, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83/100 (Quality: 87.1, Cost: 57.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Reber, FNP-C located?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C is located at 1720 UNIVERSITY DR S, Fargo, ND, 58103. Phone: (701) 234-2000.
What is Amanda Reber, FNP-C's NPI number?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1821657388, issued on 06/10/2019.
Does Amanda Reber, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C's prescribing is 28% brand-name and 72% generic drugs by claim count, with $14K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Amanda Reber, FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Amanda Reber, FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ondansetron Odt, Eliquis, Enoxaparin Sodium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Amanda Reber, FNP-C accept Medicare?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 180 Part D claims and 143 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Reber, FNP-C's credentials?
Amanda Reber, FNP-C's NPI is 1821657388 with credentials FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.