2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1255754164 FNP-BC
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC

Family Nurse Practitioner in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
425
Medicare Part D claims · 52 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
91%
generic claims · 9% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
82.5/100
▼ 1 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$288.79
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.5/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 425 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

82.5/100
MIPS score · -1 vs avg
425
Part D claims, 2023
91%
generic prescribing
$288.79
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

83 39th percentile higher than 39% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC writes more Part D claims than 51% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 37% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 51 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/28/2014

NPI 1255754164

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

425 65% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

82.5/100 0.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Pennsylvania

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Pennsylvania providers

Pennsylvania providers

Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.6%Pharmacist — 5%Pharmacist5%Physical Therapist — 4.9%Physical Therapist4.9%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Internal Medicine Physician — 3.3%Internal Medicine Physician3.3%Professional Counselor — 3.2%Professional Counselor3.2%Family Nurse Practitioner — 2.5%Family Nurse Practitioner2.5%
Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
82.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 82.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%82.5%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 82.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP-BC credentials at 4310 LONDONDERRY RD STE 109, Harrisburg, PA, 17109, with a listed phone of (717) 988-0611. NPI 1255754164 was issued on 01/28/2014. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Shandor most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 425 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 52 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $13K in drug spend, split 9% brand-name and 91% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 38.1%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 82.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 76.6, Cost 65.2), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

4310 LONDONDERRY RD STE 109
Harrisburg, PA 17109

Provider Details

NPI 1255754164
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP-BC
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/28/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.5421
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
76.6258
Quality
65.1813
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Pinnacle Health Medical Services
Harrisburg, PA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$289

Largest payer

Amgen Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Pennsylvania PA-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~45K Pennsylvania medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC. To verify Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's current license status, search the PA-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

133
Total board actions, Pennsylvania 2023
Across 129 cases
2.96
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Pennsylvania statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
48 cases

PA-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Pennsylvania disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC — brand share 9.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

9% brand-name claims vs 91% generic, on 425 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

425
Total Claims
$13K
Total Drug Cost
52
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
465
Total Day Supply
10,368
Brand vs Generic
9% brand / 91% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$3K
Generic Drug Cost
$10K
Opioid Claims
162 (38.1% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.10
Gender Split
62% female / 38% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Oxycodone Hcl
61
Morphine Sulfate
39
Lorazepam
37
Fentanyl
31
Gabapentin
26
Nortriptyline Hcl
26
Diclofenac Sodium
20
Mirtazapine
20
Baclofen
19
Tizanidine Hcl
15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's 425 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Pennsylvania

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Pennsylvania, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Shandor.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Pennsylvania medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's specialty?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Credentials: FNP-BC.
How much does Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC wrote 425 Medicare Part D claims totaling $13K in drug costs for 52 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 82.5/100 (Quality: 76.6, Cost: 65.2). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC located?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC is located at 4310 LONDONDERRY RD STE 109, Harrisburg, PA, 17109. Phone: (717) 988-0611.
What is Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's NPI number?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1255754164, issued on 01/28/2014.
Does Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's prescribing is 9% brand-name and 91% generic drugs by claim count, with $3K in brand drug costs.
Does Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC prescribe opioids?
Yes, Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC had 162 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 38.1%.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Oxycodone Hcl, Morphine Sulfate, Lorazepam. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC accept Medicare?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC appears in CMS Medicare data with 425 Part D claims and 52 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's credentials?
Amanda Shandor, FNP-BC's NPI is 1255754164 with credentials FNP-BC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.