2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1700227030 FNP
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Tymn, FNP

Nurse Practitioner in Fresno, California. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 568 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 12% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
85.8/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$614.35
9 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Amanda Tymn, FNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 85.8/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 1,754 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

85.8/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing
$614.35
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Amanda Tymn, FNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

86 49th percentile higher than 49% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Tymn, FNP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Tymn, FNP writes more Part D claims than 81% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 51% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Amanda Tymn, FNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 81 · MIPS quality — percentile: 51
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Tymn, FNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Amanda Tymn, FNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/15/2013

NPI 1700227030

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,754 62% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

85.8/100 2.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers

Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist — 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist — 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker — 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Nurse Practitioner — 0.7%Nurse Practitioner0.7%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Amanda Tymn, FNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
85.8/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 85.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%85.8%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 85.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Amanda Tymn, FNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP credentials at 1207 E HERNDON AVE, Fresno, CA, 93720, with a listed phone of (559) 432-4303. NPI 1700227030 was issued on 07/15/2013. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Tymn most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,754 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 568 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $272K in drug spend, split 12% brand-name and 88% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 85.8/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 91.3, Cost 61.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1207 E HERNDON AVE
Fresno, CA 93720

Provider Details

NPI 1700227030
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/15/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

85.7827
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
91.3046
Quality
61.3045
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Amanda Tymn, FNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$614

Largest payer

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Amanda Tymn, FNP. To verify Amanda Tymn, FNP's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Amanda Tymn, FNP — brand share 12.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

12% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 1,754 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,754
Total Claims
$272K
Total Drug Cost
568
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,708
Total Day Supply
140,042
Brand vs Generic
12% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$225K
Generic Drug Cost
$47K
Antibiotic Claims
24

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.91
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male
Age Distribution
<65: 31, 65-74: 267, 75-84: 207, 85+: 63

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Amanda Tymn, FNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Rosuvastatin Calcium
145
Amlodipine Besylate
132
Metoprolol Succinate
129
Carvedilol
124
Atorvastatin Calcium
92
Lisinopril
78
Olmesartan Medoxomil
71
Isosorbide Mononitrate Er
Isosorbide Mononitrate
60
Eliquis
Apixaban
56
Entresto
Sacubitril/Valsartan
49

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Amanda Tymn, FNP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Tymn, FNP's 1,754 claims are above the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Tymn.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Tymn, FNP's specialty?
Amanda Tymn, FNP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Fresno, California. Credentials: FNP.
How much does Amanda Tymn, FNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Amanda Tymn, FNP wrote 1,754 Medicare Part D claims totaling $272K in drug costs for 568 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Tymn, FNP's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Tymn, FNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 85.8/100 (Quality: 91.3, Cost: 61.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Tymn, FNP located?
Amanda Tymn, FNP is located at 1207 E HERNDON AVE, Fresno, CA, 93720. Phone: (559) 432-4303.
What is Amanda Tymn, FNP's NPI number?
Amanda Tymn, FNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1700227030, issued on 07/15/2013.
Does Amanda Tymn, FNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Amanda Tymn, FNP's prescribing is 12% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $225K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Amanda Tymn, FNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Amanda Tymn, FNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Rosuvastatin Calcium, Amlodipine Besylate, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Amanda Tymn, FNP accept Medicare?
Amanda Tymn, FNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,754 Part D claims and 568 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Tymn, FNP's credentials?
Amanda Tymn, FNP's NPI is 1700227030 with credentials FNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.