2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1710590427 FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

David Espinoza, FNP-C

Family Nurse Practitioner in Austin, Texas. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
437
Medicare Part D claims · 155 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
95%
generic claims · 5% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
89.4/100
▲ 6 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$645.14
18 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

David Espinoza, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 89.4/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 437 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

89.4/100
MIPS score · +6 vs avg
437
Part D claims, 2023
95%
generic prescribing
$645.14
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

David Espinoza, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

89 Top 42% higher than 58% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where David Espinoza, FNP-C sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, David Espinoza, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 51% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 59% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42David Espinoza, FNP-C — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 51 · MIPS quality — percentile: 59
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is David Espinoza, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about David Espinoza, FNP-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/24/2020

NPI 1710590427

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

437 64% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

89.4/100 6.3 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers

Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 5.6%Behavior Technician5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.1%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor — 4.4%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist — 4.4%Pharmacist4.4%Speech-Language Pathologist — 3.9%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

David Espinoza, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
89.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 89.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%89.4%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 89.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

David Espinoza, FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP-C credentials at 4101 JAMES CASEY ST STE 100, Austin, TX, 78745, with a listed phone of (512) 447-2202. NPI 1710590427 was issued on 08/24/2020. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Espinoza most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 437 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 155 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $18K in drug spend, split 5% brand-name and 95% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.6%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 89.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 75.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

4101 JAMES CASEY ST STE 100
Austin, TX 78745

Provider Details

NPI 1710590427
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/24/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

89.4449
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
75.8575
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for David Espinoza, FNP-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$645

Largest payer

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to David Espinoza, FNP-C. To verify David Espinoza, FNP-C's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

David Espinoza, FNP-C — brand share 5.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

5% brand-name claims vs 95% generic, on 437 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

437
Total Claims
$18K
Total Drug Cost
155
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
601
Total Day Supply
15,358
Brand vs Generic
5% brand / 95% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$12K
Generic Drug Cost
$6K
Opioid Claims
20 (4.6% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
30

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.55
Gender Split
45% female / 55% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What David Espinoza, FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
22
Gabapentin
21
Lidocaine-Prilocaine
Lidocaine/Prilocaine
21
Potassium Chloride
21
Mirtazapine
20
Tramadol Hcl
20
Famotidine
17
Triamcinolone Acetonide
16
Omeprazole
14
Metformin Hcl
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How David Espinoza, FNP-C fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

David Espinoza, FNP-C's 437 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Espinoza.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Texas medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is David Espinoza, FNP-C's specialty?
David Espinoza, FNP-C specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Austin, Texas. Credentials: FNP-C.
How much does David Espinoza, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, David Espinoza, FNP-C wrote 437 Medicare Part D claims totaling $18K in drug costs for 155 beneficiaries.
What is David Espinoza, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
David Espinoza, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 89.4/100 (Quality: 75.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is David Espinoza, FNP-C located?
David Espinoza, FNP-C is located at 4101 JAMES CASEY ST STE 100, Austin, TX, 78745. Phone: (512) 447-2202.
What is David Espinoza, FNP-C's NPI number?
David Espinoza, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1710590427, issued on 08/24/2020.
Does David Espinoza, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
David Espinoza, FNP-C's prescribing is 5% brand-name and 95% generic drugs by claim count, with $12K in brand drug costs.
Does David Espinoza, FNP-C prescribe opioids?
Yes, David Espinoza, FNP-C had 20 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.6%.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does David Espinoza, FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, David Espinoza, FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ondansetron Odt, Gabapentin, Lidocaine-Prilocaine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does David Espinoza, FNP-C accept Medicare?
David Espinoza, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 437 Part D claims and 155 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify David Espinoza, FNP-C's credentials?
David Espinoza, FNP-C's NPI is 1710590427 with credentials FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.