2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1588209001 DNP, APRN, FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C

Family Nurse Practitioner in Fort Worth, Texas. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 570 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
75%
generic claims · 25% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
75.3/100
▼ 8 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$241.12
13 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75.3/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 2,310 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

75.3/100
MIPS score · -8 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
75%
generic prescribing
$241.12
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

75 15th percentile higher than 15% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 83% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 16% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 16
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/07/2019

NPI 1588209001

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,310 89% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

75.3/100 7.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers

Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 5.6%Behavior Technician5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.1%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor — 4.4%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist — 4.4%Pharmacist4.4%Speech-Language Pathologist — 3.9%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
75.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 75.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%75.3%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 75.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding DNP, APRN, FNP-C credentials at 1300 W TERRELL AVE STE 500, Fort Worth, TX, 76104, with a listed phone of (817) 252-5000. NPI 1588209001 was issued on 11/07/2019. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Estes most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 2,310 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 570 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $753K in drug spend, split 25% brand-name and 75% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 75.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 68.1, Cost 49.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1300 W TERRELL AVE STE 500
Fort Worth, TX 76104

Provider Details

NPI 1588209001
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials DNP, APRN, FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/07/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

75.2752
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
68.0792
Quality
49.5048
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$241

Largest payer

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C. To verify Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C — brand share 25.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

25% brand-name claims vs 75% generic, on 2,310 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

2,310
Total Claims
$753K
Total Drug Cost
570
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
5,724
Total Day Supply
169,789
Brand vs Generic
25% brand / 75% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$690K
Generic Drug Cost
$63K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.79
Gender Split
47% female / 53% male
Age Distribution
<65: 19, 65-74: 204, 75-84: 249, 85+: 98

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Eliquis
Apixaban
334
Sotalol
Sotalol Hcl
239
Metoprolol Succinate
233
Carvedilol
151
Flecainide Acetate
132
Amiodarone Hcl
92
Furosemide
87
Metoprolol Tartrate
78
Lisinopril
74
Xarelto
Rivaroxaban
72

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's 2,310 claims are above the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Estes.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Texas medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's specialty?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Fort Worth, Texas. Credentials: DNP, APRN, FNP-C.
How much does Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C wrote 2,310 Medicare Part D claims totaling $753K in drug costs for 570 beneficiaries.
What is Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 75.3/100 (Quality: 68.1, Cost: 49.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C located?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C is located at 1300 W TERRELL AVE STE 500, Fort Worth, TX, 76104. Phone: (817) 252-5000.
What is Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's NPI number?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1588209001, issued on 11/07/2019.
Does Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's prescribing is 25% brand-name and 75% generic drugs by claim count, with $690K in brand drug costs.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Eliquis, Sotalol, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C accept Medicare?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,310 Part D claims and 570 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's credentials?
Emily Estes, DNP, APRN, FNP-C's NPI is 1588209001 with credentials DNP, APRN, FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.