2026 NPPES data Internal Medicine Physician NPI 1356834477 MD
Verify on CMS →

Kushang Shah, MD

Internal Medicine Physician in Orlando, Florida. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 172,858 in Internal Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
116
Medicare Part D claims · 40 beneficiaries · Internal Medicine Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
78%
generic claims · 22% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
79.3/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Kushang Shah, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 116 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

79.3/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
116
Part D claims, 2023
78%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Kushang Shah, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

79 30th percentile higher than 30% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kushang Shah, MD sits

This provider among internal medicine physician peers

Across the 36,260 internal medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kushang Shah, MD writes more Part D claims than 15% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 29% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Kushang Shah, MD — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 29
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one internal medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kushang Shah, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Kushang Shah, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Kushang Shah, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/13/2018

NPI 1356834477

Primary specialty

Internal Medicine Physician

High-volume

172,858 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

116 96% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,716

MIPS final score

79.3/100 3.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Florida

How Internal Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Florida providers

Florida providers

Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 16.1%Behavior Technician16.1%Mental Health Counselor — 4.8%Mental Health Counselor4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Pharmacist — 4.2%Pharmacist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.8%Physical Therapist — 3.1%Physical Therapist3.1%Internal Medicine Physician — 2.4%Internal Medicine Physician2.4%
Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Kushang Shah, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Internal Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) — 79.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%79.3%
MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) — 79.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Kushang Shah, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Internal Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 6651 VINELAND RD STE 150, Orlando, FL, 32819, with a listed phone of (516) 582-3749. NPI 1356834477 was issued on 06/13/2018. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Shah most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 116 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 40 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $11K in drug spend, split 22% brand-name and 78% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 79.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 73.7, Cost 60.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Internal Medicine Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 172,858 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 2,716 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

6651 VINELAND RD STE 150
Orlando, FL 32819

Provider Details

NPI 1356834477
Specialty Internal Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/13/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.2722
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
73.7265
Quality
60.5143
Cost
76
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — Florida FLDOH 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~75K Florida medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Kushang Shah, MD. To verify Kushang Shah, MD's current license status, search the FLDOH public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

480
Total board actions, Florida 2023
Across 467 cases
6.40
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Florida statewide rate
monetary fine
Most common action type
138 cases

FLDOH publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Florida disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Kushang Shah, MD — brand share 22.0%
Internal Medicine Physician average

22% brand-name claims vs 78% generic, on 116 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

116
Total Claims
$11K
Total Drug Cost
40
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
116
Total Day Supply
2,287
Brand vs Generic
22% brand / 78% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$9K
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
26

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.34
Gender Split
43% female / 58% male

Internal Medicine Physician Overview

How Kushang Shah, MD fits within the Internal Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

172,858
Internal Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Internal Medicine Physician
2,716
Avg Claims per Provider

Kushang Shah, MD's 116 claims are below the specialty average of 2,716.

Nearby Internal Medicine Physician Providers in Florida

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Florida, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Shah.

Compare Internal Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Florida medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Internal Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kushang Shah, MD's specialty?
Kushang Shah, MD specializes in Internal Medicine Physician and practices in Orlando, Florida. Credentials: MD.
How much does Kushang Shah, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Kushang Shah, MD wrote 116 Medicare Part D claims totaling $11K in drug costs for 40 beneficiaries.
What is Kushang Shah, MD's Medicare quality score?
Kushang Shah, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.3/100 (Quality: 73.7, Cost: 60.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kushang Shah, MD located?
Kushang Shah, MD is located at 6651 VINELAND RD STE 150, Orlando, FL, 32819. Phone: (516) 582-3749.
What is Kushang Shah, MD's NPI number?
Kushang Shah, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356834477, issued on 06/13/2018.
Does Kushang Shah, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Kushang Shah, MD's prescribing is 22% brand-name and 78% generic drugs by claim count, with $9K in brand drug costs.
How many Internal Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 172,858 Internal Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Internal Medicine Physician provider writes 2,716 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Kushang Shah, MD accept Medicare?
Kushang Shah, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 116 Part D claims and 40 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kushang Shah, MD's credentials?
Kushang Shah, MD's NPI is 1356834477 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.