2026 NPPES data Dermatology Physician NPI 1043294473 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Mark Valentine, M.D.

Dermatology Physician in Everett, Washington. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 14,610 in Dermatology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
161
Medicare Part D claims · 58 beneficiaries · Dermatology Physician avg: 729
Generic prescribing
74%
generic claims · 26% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
77.3/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Mark Valentine, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.3/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 161 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

77.3/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
161
Part D claims, 2023
74%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Mark Valentine, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

77 24th percentile higher than 24% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Valentine, M.D. sits

This provider among dermatology physician peers

Across the 6,594 dermatology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Valentine, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 9% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 34% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Mark Valentine, M.D. — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality — percentile: 34
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one dermatology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Valentine, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Mark Valentine, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Mark Valentine, M.D.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/30/2005

NPI 1043294473

Primary specialty

Dermatology Physician

Mid-sized

14,610 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

161 78% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 729

MIPS final score

77.3/100 5.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Dermatology Physician compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers

Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Mental Health Counselor — 8.6%Mental Health Counselor8.6%Massage Therapist — 6.5%Massage Therapist6.5%Counselor — 5.7%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician — 4.5%Behavior Technician4.5%Pharmacist — 4%Pharmacist4%Physical Therapist — 3.6%Physical Therapist3.6%Dermatology Physician — 0.2%Dermatology Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Mark Valentine, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Dermatology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
77.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Dermatology Physician) — 77.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%77.3%
MIPS final score (Dermatology Physician) — 77.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Mark Valentine, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Dermatology Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 3327 COLBY AVE, Everett, WA, 98201, with a listed phone of (425) 258-6767. NPI 1043294473 was issued on 11/30/2005. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Valentine most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 161 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 58 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $409K in drug spend, split 26% brand-name and 74% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 77.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85, Cost 59.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Dermatology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 14,610 enrolled providers across 53 states and an average of 729 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3327 COLBY AVE
Everett, WA 98201

Provider Details

NPI 1043294473
Specialty Dermatology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 11/30/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.3148
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.0473
Quality
59.3353
Cost
76
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Mark Valentine, M.D.. To verify Mark Valentine, M.D.'s current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Mark Valentine, M.D. — brand share 26.0%
Dermatology Physician average

26% brand-name claims vs 74% generic, on 161 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

161
Total Claims
$409K
Total Drug Cost
58
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
204
Total Day Supply
5,806
Brand vs Generic
26% brand / 74% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$403K
Generic Drug Cost
$6K
Antibiotic Claims
14

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.30
Gender Split
55% female / 45% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Mark Valentine, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Humira Pen
Adalimumab
12
Betamethasone Dipropionate
11
Folic Acid
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Dermatology Physician Overview

How Mark Valentine, M.D. fits within the Dermatology Physician landscape nationally.

14,610
Dermatology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Dermatology Physician
729
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Valentine, M.D.'s 161 claims are below the specialty average of 729.

Nearby Dermatology Physician Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Valentine.

Compare Dermatology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Washington medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Dermatology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Valentine, M.D.'s specialty?
Mark Valentine, M.D. specializes in Dermatology Physician and practices in Everett, Washington. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Mark Valentine, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Mark Valentine, M.D. wrote 161 Medicare Part D claims totaling $409K in drug costs for 58 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Valentine, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Mark Valentine, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 77.3/100 (Quality: 85, Cost: 59.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Valentine, M.D. located?
Mark Valentine, M.D. is located at 3327 COLBY AVE, Everett, WA, 98201. Phone: (425) 258-6767.
What is Mark Valentine, M.D.'s NPI number?
Mark Valentine, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1043294473, issued on 11/30/2005.
Does Mark Valentine, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Mark Valentine, M.D.'s prescribing is 26% brand-name and 74% generic drugs by claim count, with $403K in brand drug costs.
How many Dermatology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 14,610 Dermatology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Dermatology Physician provider writes 729 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mark Valentine, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Mark Valentine, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Humira Pen, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Folic Acid. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mark Valentine, M.D. accept Medicare?
Mark Valentine, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 161 Part D claims and 58 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Valentine, M.D.'s credentials?
Mark Valentine, M.D.'s NPI is 1043294473 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.