2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1477900678 FNP
Verify on CMS →

Michael Wood, FNP

Family Nurse Practitioner in San Tan Valley, Arizona. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
174
Medicare Part D claims · 123 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
82%
generic claims · 11% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Michael Wood, FNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 174 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
174
Part D claims, 2023
82%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Michael Wood, FNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

100 Top 7% higher than 93% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Michael Wood, FNP sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Michael Wood, FNP writes more Part D claims than 31% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 92% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Michael Wood, FNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Michael Wood, FNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Michael Wood, FNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/17/2016

NPI 1477900678

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

174 86% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

100/100 16.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Arizona

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Arizona providers

Arizona providers

Largest specialties in Arizona (% of in-state providers)

Pharmacist — 5.6%Pharmacist5.6%Behavior Technician — 5.6%Behavior Technician5.6%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.3%Physical Therapist — 4.2%Physical Therapist4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist — 3.5%Speech-Language Pathologist3.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.5%
Largest specialties in Arizona (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Michael Wood, FNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%99%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Michael Wood, FNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP credentials at 287 E HUNT HWY STE 105, San Tan Valley, AZ, 85143, with a listed phone of (480) 677-8282. NPI 1477900678 was issued on 05/17/2016. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Wood most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 174 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 123 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $2K in drug spend, split 11% brand-name and 82% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 100/100 for the 2023 performance year, compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

287 E HUNT HWY STE 105
San Tan Valley, AZ 85143

Provider Details

NPI 1477900678
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/17/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Michael Wood, FNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Good Health Medical PLLC
San Tan Valley, AZ
The Little Clinic OF Arizona LLC
Mesa, AZ

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Michael Wood, FNP — brand share 11.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

11% brand-name claims vs 82% generic, on 174 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

174
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
123
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
199
Total Day Supply
2,461
Brand vs Generic
11% brand / 82% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$336
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
62

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.01
Gender Split
68% female / 32% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Michael Wood, FNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
16
Methylprednisolone
15
Doxycycline Hyclate
14
Paxlovid (Eua)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir
13
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
11
Prednisone
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Michael Wood, FNP fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Michael Wood, FNP's 174 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Arizona

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Arizona, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Wood.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Arizona medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael Wood, FNP's specialty?
Michael Wood, FNP specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in San Tan Valley, Arizona. Credentials: FNP.
How much does Michael Wood, FNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Michael Wood, FNP wrote 174 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 123 beneficiaries.
What is Michael Wood, FNP's Medicare quality score?
Michael Wood, FNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100. The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Michael Wood, FNP located?
Michael Wood, FNP is located at 287 E HUNT HWY STE 105, San Tan Valley, AZ, 85143. Phone: (480) 677-8282.
What is Michael Wood, FNP's NPI number?
Michael Wood, FNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1477900678, issued on 05/17/2016.
Does Michael Wood, FNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Michael Wood, FNP's prescribing is 11% brand-name and 82% generic drugs by claim count, with $336 in brand drug costs.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Michael Wood, FNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Michael Wood, FNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass, Methylprednisolone, Doxycycline Hyclate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Michael Wood, FNP accept Medicare?
Michael Wood, FNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 174 Part D claims and 123 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Michael Wood, FNP's credentials?
Michael Wood, FNP's NPI is 1477900678 with credentials FNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.