2026 NPPES data Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician NPI 1801021126 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Thomas Oberg, M.D.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in Holladay, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 291 in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
608
Medicare Part D claims · 289 beneficiaries · Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician avg: 624
Generic prescribing
93%
generic claims · 7% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
97.2/100
▲ 14 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$41.64
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Thomas Oberg, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.2/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 608 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

97.2/100
MIPS score · +14 vs avg
608
Part D claims, 2023
93%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

97 Top 15% higher than 85% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Thomas Oberg, M.D. sits

This provider among ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peers

Across the 141 ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Thomas Oberg, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 55% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 87% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Thomas Oberg, M.D.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Thomas Oberg, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Thomas Oberg, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Thomas Oberg, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/17/2009

NPI 1801021126

Primary specialty

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

Rare

291 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

608 3% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 624

MIPS final score

97.2/100 14.1 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician - 12.4%Behavior Technician12.4%Clinical Social Worker - 6.3%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker - 6.1%Community Health Worker6.1%Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.9%Counselor - 4.9%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.3%Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician - 0%Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician0%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
97.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 97.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%97.2%
MIPS final score (Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 97.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Thomas Oberg, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 5200 S HIGHLAND DR STE 201, Holladay, UT, 84117, with a listed phone of (801) 363-3356. NPI 1801021126 was issued on 05/17/2009.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 608 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 289 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $382K in drug spend, split 7% brand-name and 93% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 16.8%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 97.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 97.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 291 enrolled providers across 46 states and an average of 624 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

5200 S HIGHLAND DR STE 201
Holladay, UT 84117

Provider Details

NPI 1801021126
Specialty Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/17/2009

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

97.2476
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
97.7229
Quality
95
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Individual

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Thomas Oberg, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Advanced Eye Care
Salt Lake City, UT
Oculoplastic Surgery Inc
Holladay, UT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Thomas Oberg, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$42

Largest payer

ABBVIE INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Thomas Oberg, M.D. - brand share 7.0%
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician average

7% brand-name claims vs 93% generic, on 608 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

608
Total Claims
$382K
Total Drug Cost
289
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
628
Total Day Supply
8,660
Brand vs Generic
7% brand / 93% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$376K
Generic Drug Cost
$6K
Opioid Claims
102 (16.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
20

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.05
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male
Age Distribution
<65: 12, 65-74: 141, 75-84: 109, 85+: 27

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Thomas Oberg, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Erythromycin
Erythromycin Base
332
Oxycodone Hcl
93
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth
Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha
64
Ofloxacin
17
Methylprednisolone
16
Cephalexin
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Overview

How Thomas Oberg, M.D. fits within the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

291
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in US
46
States with Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
624
Avg Claims per Provider

Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s 608 claims are below the specialty average of 624.

Nearby Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Oberg.

Compare Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Utah medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s specialty?
Thomas Oberg, M.D. specializes in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician and practices in Holladay, Utah. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Thomas Oberg, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Thomas Oberg, M.D. wrote 608 Medicare Part D claims totaling $382K in drug costs for 289 beneficiaries.
What is Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Thomas Oberg, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 97.2/100 (Quality: 97.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Thomas Oberg, M.D. located?
Thomas Oberg, M.D. is located at 5200 S HIGHLAND DR STE 201, Holladay, UT, 84117. Phone: (801) 363-3356.
What is Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s NPI number?
Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1801021126, issued on 05/17/2009.
Does Thomas Oberg, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s prescribing is 7% brand-name and 93% generic drugs by claim count, with $376K in brand drug costs.
Does Thomas Oberg, M.D. prescribe opioids?
Yes, Thomas Oberg, M.D. had 102 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 16.8%.
How many Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 291 Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers across 46 states in the US. The average Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider writes 624 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Thomas Oberg, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Erythromycin, Oxycodone Hcl, Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Thomas Oberg, M.D. accept Medicare?
Thomas Oberg, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 608 Part D claims and 289 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s credentials?
Thomas Oberg, M.D.'s NPI is 1801021126 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.