Home / Compare / Comparison

Health Information Specialist/Technologist vs Registered Record Administrator

Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.

This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Health Information Specialist/Technologist, which currently counts 255 enrolled providers across 40 U.S. states and territories, and Registered Record Administrator, with 61 providers across 20 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Health Information Specialist/Technologist or Registered Record Administrator rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.

On national volume, Health Information Specialist/Technologist carries the larger provider roster (255 vs 61), and Health Information Specialist/Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 40 states versus 20. The top Health Information Specialist/Technologist concentration sits in California (48 providers), while Registered Record Administrator peaks in California (19). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.

Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Health Information Specialist/Technologist and Registered Record Administrator are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.

Health Information Specialist/Technologist

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Health Information

255
Providers
40
States
View specialty →

Registered Record Administrator

Category: Specialist/Technologist, Health Information

61
Providers
20
States
View specialty →

Top 5 States — Health Information Specialist/Technologist

California 48
Florida 18
New York 15
Illinois 13
Texas 13

Top 5 States — Registered Record Administrator

California 19
Ohio 9
Oregon 5
Texas 4
Nevada 3

How do these providers compare by location?

State Health Information Specialist/Technologist Registered Record Administrator
California 48 19
Florida 18 1
Ohio 9 9
Texas 13 4
New York 15 1
Illinois 13 1
Oregon 9 5
Georgia 12 1
Washington 7 3
Colorado 7 2
Michigan 7 2
Massachusetts 8 0
Nevada 5 3
Arizona 5 2
Arkansas 7 0
North Carolina 7 0
Louisiana 4 2
Tennessee 6 0
Alabama 5 0
New Jersey 4 1
District of Columbia 5 0
Minnesota 4 0
Missouri 3 1
Oklahoma 4 0
South Carolina 3 1
Maryland 3 0
Mississippi 3 0
Hawaii 1 1
Indiana 2 0
Pennsylvania 2 0
Utah 2 0
Connecticut 1 0
Delaware 1 0
Idaho 1 0
Kansas 0 1
Nebraska 1 0
New Mexico 1 0
Virginia 1 0
Wisconsin 1 0
Wyoming 1 0

Summary

Health Information Specialist/Technologist has more registered providers nationally (255 vs 61). Health Information Specialist/Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 40 states.

Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.

See all Health Information Specialist/Technologist providers in California →

FAQ

How many Health Information Specialist/Technologist providers are there vs Registered Record Administrator?
There are 255 Health Information Specialist/Technologist providers and 61 Registered Record Administrator providers registered in the CMS NPPES directory.
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage?
Health Information Specialist/Technologist has broader coverage with 40 states vs 20 states.
Where is the data from?
Provider counts are from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates.

Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.