Health Information Specialist/Technologist vs Registered Record Administrator
Side-by-side comparison of provider counts, geographic distribution, and per-capita density across U.S. states.
This page compares two distinct NUCC-taxonomy specialties tracked by the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System: Health Information Specialist/Technologist, which currently counts 255 enrolled providers across 40 U.S. states and territories, and Registered Record Administrator, with 61 providers across 20 states. Each clinician on these rosters selected a primary NUCC code at NPI enrollment, so the totals measure how many providers self-identify their primary practice as Health Information Specialist/Technologist or Registered Record Administrator rather than the total population ever trained or credentialed in either field — dual-certified clinicians show up under whichever code they registered first.
On national volume, Health Information Specialist/Technologist carries the larger provider roster (255 vs 61), and Health Information Specialist/Technologist has the wider geographic footprint at 40 states versus 20. The top Health Information Specialist/Technologist concentration sits in California (48 providers), while Registered Record Administrator peaks in California (19). The per-capita columns in the table below normalize each state's raw count against 2023 Census population estimates, which matters because absolute provider counts track population scale first and specialty density second — a small state with a strong training pipeline can out-rank a larger state on per-100K availability.
Use this comparison to understand relative availability, not to judge clinical substitutability — Health Information Specialist/Technologist and Registered Record Administrator are distinct specialties with different scopes of practice, training requirements, and conditions they treat, even when their NUCC categories overlap. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available CMS government data, not medical advice, a provider rating, or a recommendation about which specialty a patient should consult. Always work with a licensed clinician to determine which specialty is appropriate for your condition, verify any specific provider through the NPPES NPI Registry and the relevant state medical board, and consult the NUCC taxonomy documentation for the formal scope-of-practice definitions behind each specialty code.
Health Information Specialist/Technologist
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Health Information
Registered Record Administrator
Category: Specialist/Technologist, Health Information
Top 5 States — Health Information Specialist/Technologist
Top 5 States — Registered Record Administrator
How do these providers compare by location?
| State | Health Information Specialist/Technologist | Registered Record Administrator |
|---|---|---|
| California | 48 | 19 |
| Florida | 18 | 1 |
| Ohio | 9 | 9 |
| Texas | 13 | 4 |
| New York | 15 | 1 |
| Illinois | 13 | 1 |
| Oregon | 9 | 5 |
| Georgia | 12 | 1 |
| Washington | 7 | 3 |
| Colorado | 7 | 2 |
| Michigan | 7 | 2 |
| Massachusetts | 8 | 0 |
| Nevada | 5 | 3 |
| Arizona | 5 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 7 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 7 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 4 | 2 |
| Tennessee | 6 | 0 |
| Alabama | 5 | 0 |
| New Jersey | 4 | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 5 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 4 | 0 |
| Missouri | 3 | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 4 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 3 | 1 |
| Maryland | 3 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 3 | 0 |
| Hawaii | 1 | 1 |
| Indiana | 2 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | 0 |
| Utah | 2 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 1 | 0 |
| Delaware | 1 | 0 |
| Idaho | 1 | 0 |
| Kansas | 0 | 1 |
| Nebraska | 1 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 1 | 0 |
| Virginia | 1 | 0 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 1 | 0 |
Summary
Health Information Specialist/Technologist has more registered providers nationally (255 vs 61). Health Information Specialist/Technologist has broader geographic coverage across 40 states.
Related Comparisons
Dive deeper into either specialty, or pivot to a different comparison — all rosters drawn from the CMS NPPES registry and NUCC taxonomy.
See all Health Information Specialist/Technologist providers in California →
FAQ
How many Health Information Specialist/Technologist providers are there vs Registered Record Administrator? ▼
Which specialty has broader geographic coverage? ▼
Where is the data from? ▼
Provider data from CMS NPPES (download.cms.gov/nppes); specialty classifications from the NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; each clinician identified by NPI. Per-capita rates use 2023 Census population estimates. PlainDoctor does not rate or recommend providers. Methodology · About.