PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician NPI 1215597778 MD
Verify on CMS →

Alison Kosmacki, MD

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician in Denver, Colorado.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 45,074 in Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
27
Medicare Part D claims · Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician avg: 188
MIPS score
79.3/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$2.1K
6 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Alison Kosmacki, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 27 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

79.3/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
27
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥26th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Alison Kosmacki, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1215597778), first enumerated 06/17/2019.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 27 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $2.1K in reported industry payments (6 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1215597778 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1215597778
  • ENUM-RECENT 2019
  • TAX-MID 45K Obstetrics &
  • MIPS-BELOW 79.3/100
  • RX-TRACE 27
  • BOOK-LIGHT 872 in Colorado
  • PHOTO-FINISH Laura Baalmann · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Alison Kosmacki, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 26th percentile 26% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Alison Kosmacki, MD sits

This provider among obstetrics & gynecology physician peers

Across the 7,360 obstetrics & gynecology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Alison Kosmacki, MD writes more Part D claims than 11% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 24% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Alison Kosmacki, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one obstetrics & gynecology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Alison Kosmacki, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Alison Kosmacki, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Alison Kosmacki, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/17/2019

NPI 1215597778

Primary specialty

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician

Mid-sized

45,074 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

27 86% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 188

MIPS final score

79.3/100 4.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Colorado

How Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician compares to other specialties among Colorado providers

Colorado providers
Behavior Technician8.2%Mental Health Counselor6.1%Clinical Social Worker4.3%Physical Therapist4.2%Professional Counselor3.7%Registered Nurse3.6%Obstetrics & Gynecology Phys…0.6%
Largest specialties in Colorado (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Alison Kosmacki, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%79.3%
MIPS final score (Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician) - 79.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2045 N FRANKLIN ST
Denver, CO 80205
(303) 338-4545

Provider Details

NPI 1215597778
Specialty Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/17/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.292
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
71.46
Quality
59.5132
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Alison Kosmacki, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$2.1K

Largest payer

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

27
Total Claims
$258
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
27
Total Day Supply
487
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$258

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
50.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.09
More Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician in CO → All providers in Colorado → Compare specialties →

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Overview

How Alison Kosmacki, MD fits within the Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician landscape nationally.

45,074
Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Providers in US
56
States with Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician
188
Avg Claims per Provider

Alison Kosmacki, MD's 27 claims are below the specialty average of 188.

Nationwide Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Kosmacki, both outside Colorado so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (79.3 here).

Laura Baalmann 79.3 MO Elise Bardawil 79.3 MO Emily Barker 79.3 IL Katherine Bligard 79.3 MO

Same NPPES enumeration year (2019)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Samantha Raad Woodland Hills, CA Israel Benjamin Cherry Hill, NJ Sharan Mullen Leonardtown, MD Stephanie Melchor Fresno, CA

Nearby Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Providers in Colorado

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Colorado, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kosmacki.

One of 872 Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers enrolled in Colorado, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Christine Abair
MD
Louisville, CO
Dr. Monica Abarca
MD
Littleton, CO
Dr. Stewart Abbot
M.D.
Greeley, CO
Dr. Carolyn Abman
MD
Littleton, CO
Dr. Jenna Adams
MD
Greeley, CO

Compare Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Alison Kosmacki, MD's specialty? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD specializes in Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician and practices in Denver, Colorado. Credentials: MD.
How much does Alison Kosmacki, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Alison Kosmacki, MD wrote 27 Medicare Part D claims totaling $258 in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Alison Kosmacki, MD's Medicare quality score? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.3/100 (Quality: 71.5, Cost: 59.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Alison Kosmacki, MD located? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD is located at 2045 N FRANKLIN ST, Denver, CO, 80205. Phone: (303) 338-4545.
What is Alison Kosmacki, MD's NPI number? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1215597778, issued on 06/17/2019.
How many Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 45,074 Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician provider writes 188 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Alison Kosmacki, MD accept Medicare? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 27 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Alison Kosmacki, MD's credentials? ▼
Alison Kosmacki, MD's NPI is 1215597778 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.