2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1699791657 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Allison Smith, ARNP

Nurse Practitioner in Sarasota, Florida. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
427
Medicare Part D claims · 140 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
80%
generic claims · 20% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
89.7/100
▲ 7 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$321.07
16 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Allison Smith, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 89.7/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 427 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

89.7/100
MIPS score · +7 vs avg
427
Part D claims, 2023
80%
generic prescribing
$321.07
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Allison Smith, ARNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

90 Top 42% higher than 58% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Allison Smith, ARNP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Allison Smith, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 52% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 59% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Allison Smith, ARNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 59
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Allison Smith, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Allison Smith, ARNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/14/2006

NPI 1699791657

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

427 61% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

89.7/100 6.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Florida

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Florida providers

Florida providers

Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 16.1%Behavior Technician16.1%Mental Health Counselor — 4.8%Mental Health Counselor4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Pharmacist — 4.2%Pharmacist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.8%Physical Therapist — 3.1%Physical Therapist3.1%Nurse Practitioner — 1.8%Nurse Practitioner1.8%
Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Allison Smith, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
89.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 89.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%89.7%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 89.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Allison Smith, ARNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding ARNP credentials at 1617 S TUTTLE AVE, Sarasota, FL, 34239, with a listed phone of (941) 330-8885. NPI 1699791657 was issued on 07/14/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Smith most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 427 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 140 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $43K in drug spend, split 20% brand-name and 80% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 89.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 97.9, Cost 67.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1617 S TUTTLE AVE
Sarasota, FL 34239

Provider Details

NPI 1699791657
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/14/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

89.6733
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
97.8656
Quality
67.7122
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Allison Smith, ARNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Florida Woman Care LLC
Sarasota, FL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Allison Smith, ARNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$321

Largest payer

Astellas Pharma US Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Florida FLDOH 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~75K Florida medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Allison Smith, ARNP. To verify Allison Smith, ARNP's current license status, search the FLDOH public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

480
Total board actions, Florida 2023
Across 467 cases
6.40
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Florida statewide rate
monetary fine
Most common action type
138 cases

FLDOH publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Florida disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Allison Smith, ARNP — brand share 20.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

20% brand-name claims vs 80% generic, on 427 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

427
Total Claims
$43K
Total Drug Cost
140
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
939
Total Day Supply
26,222
Brand vs Generic
20% brand / 80% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$21K
Generic Drug Cost
$22K
Antibiotic Claims
20

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.85

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Allison Smith, ARNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Estradiol
89
Estradiol (Twice Weekly)
Estradiol
41
Estradiol (Once Weekly)
Estradiol
26
Valacyclovir
Valacyclovir Hcl
18
Fluconazole
17
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
14
Clobetasol Propionate
13
Progesterone
"Progesterone
N/A

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Allison Smith, ARNP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Allison Smith, ARNP's 427 claims are below the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Florida

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Florida, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Smith.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Florida medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Allison Smith, ARNP's specialty?
Allison Smith, ARNP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Sarasota, Florida. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Allison Smith, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Allison Smith, ARNP wrote 427 Medicare Part D claims totaling $43K in drug costs for 140 beneficiaries.
What is Allison Smith, ARNP's Medicare quality score?
Allison Smith, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 89.7/100 (Quality: 97.9, Cost: 67.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Allison Smith, ARNP located?
Allison Smith, ARNP is located at 1617 S TUTTLE AVE, Sarasota, FL, 34239. Phone: (941) 330-8885.
What is Allison Smith, ARNP's NPI number?
Allison Smith, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1699791657, issued on 07/14/2006.
Does Allison Smith, ARNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Allison Smith, ARNP's prescribing is 20% brand-name and 80% generic drugs by claim count, with $21K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Allison Smith, ARNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Allison Smith, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Estradiol, Estradiol (Twice Weekly), Estradiol (Once Weekly). This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Allison Smith, ARNP accept Medicare?
Allison Smith, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 427 Part D claims and 140 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Allison Smith, ARNP's credentials?
Allison Smith, ARNP's NPI is 1699791657 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.