2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1598139032
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Schuler

Registered Nurse in Fort Wayne, Indiana. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 175,652 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
693
Medicare Part D claims · 467 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
89%
generic claims · 7% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.2/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Amanda Schuler reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 693 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

81.2/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
693
Part D claims, 2023
89%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Amanda Schuler's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

81 36th percentile higher than 36% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Schuler sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,327 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Schuler writes more Part D claims than 65% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 31% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Amanda Schuler — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 31
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Schuler. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Amanda Schuler?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/20/2015

NPI 1598139032

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

175,652 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

693 31% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

81.2/100 1.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Indiana

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Indiana providers

Indiana providers

Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 13.6%Behavior Technician13.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Pharmacist — 4.3%Pharmacist4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.2%Family Nurse Practitioner4.2%Clinical Social Worker — 4.2%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Mental Health Counselor — 4.1%Mental Health Counselor4.1%Registered Nurse — 2.1%Registered Nurse2.1%
Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Amanda Schuler's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%81.2%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Amanda Schuler appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Registered Nurse provider at 3909 NEW VISION DR, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, with a listed phone of (260) 469-6610. NPI 1598139032 was issued on 11/20/2015. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Schuler most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 693 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 467 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $15K in drug spend, split 7% brand-name and 89% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 81.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 69, Cost 68.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Registered Nurse is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 175,652 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,000 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3909 NEW VISION DR
Fort Wayne, IN 46845

Provider Details

NPI 1598139032
Specialty Registered Nurse
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/20/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.234
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
68.9532
Quality
68.4936
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Amanda Schuler bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Parkview Health System Inc
Huntington, IN
Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc
Wabash, IN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Amanda Schuler — brand share 7.0%
Registered Nurse average

7% brand-name claims vs 89% generic, on 693 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

693
Total Claims
$15K
Total Drug Cost
467
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
696
Total Day Supply
6,821
Brand vs Generic
7% brand / 89% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$5K
Generic Drug Cost
$7K
Antibiotic Claims
300

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.25
Gender Split
65% female / 35% male
Age Distribution
<65: 80, 65-74: 207, 75-84: 138, 85+: 42

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Amanda Schuler prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Cephalexin
88
Prednisone
83
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
72
Methylprednisolone
60
Doxycycline Hyclate
45
Azithromycin
39
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
23
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
19
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
17
Fluconazole
16

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Amanda Schuler fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

175,652
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Schuler's 693 claims are below the specialty average of 1,000.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Indiana

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Indiana, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schuler.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Indiana medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Schuler's specialty?
Amanda Schuler specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
How much does Amanda Schuler prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Amanda Schuler wrote 693 Medicare Part D claims totaling $15K in drug costs for 467 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Schuler's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Schuler has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.2/100 (Quality: 69, Cost: 68.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Schuler located?
Amanda Schuler is located at 3909 NEW VISION DR, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845. Phone: (260) 469-6610.
What is Amanda Schuler's NPI number?
Amanda Schuler's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1598139032, issued on 11/20/2015.
Does Amanda Schuler prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Amanda Schuler's prescribing is 7% brand-name and 89% generic drugs by claim count, with $5K in brand drug costs.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 175,652 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Amanda Schuler prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Amanda Schuler's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin, Prednisone, Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Amanda Schuler accept Medicare?
Amanda Schuler appears in CMS Medicare data with 693 Part D claims and 467 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Schuler's credentials?
Amanda Schuler's NPI is 1598139032. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.