2026 NPPES data Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician NPI 1407103880 MD
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Silva, MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in Charlottesville, Virginia. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 2,352 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
18
Medicare Part D claims · 14 beneficiaries · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician avg: 86
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$499.11
4 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Amanda Silva, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 18 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
18
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Amanda Silva, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

100 Top 7% higher than 93% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Silva, MD sits

This provider among plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peers

Across the 276 plastic and reconstructive surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Silva, MD writes more Part D claims than 15% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 93% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Amanda Silva, MD — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Silva, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Amanda Silva, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Amanda Silva, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/05/2012

NPI 1407103880

Primary specialty

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

Niche

2,352 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

18 79% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 86

MIPS final score

100/100 16.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers

Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 5.2%Behavior Technician5.2%Clinical Social Worker — 5.1%Clinical Social Worker5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Physical Therapist — 4.6%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist — 4.5%Pharmacist4.5%Professional Counselor — 4%Professional Counselor4%Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician — 0%Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician0%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Amanda Silva, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%99%
MIPS final score (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Amanda Silva, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider holding MD credentials at 1215 LEE ST, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, with a listed phone of (434) 243-2000. NPI 1407103880 was issued on 08/05/2012. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Silva most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 18 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 14 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $763 in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 100/100 for the 2023 performance year, compared with the national average of 83.1.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 2,352 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 86 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1215 LEE ST
Charlottesville, VA 22908

Provider Details

NPI 1407103880
Specialty Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/05/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Amanda Silva, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Select Physical Therapy Holdings Inc
Staunton, VA
University OF Virginia Physicians Group
Charlottesville, VA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Amanda Silva, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$499

Largest payer

Integra LifeSciences Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

18
Total Claims
$763
Total Drug Cost
14
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
18
Total Day Supply
277
Generic Drug Cost
$177

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.14

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Overview

How Amanda Silva, MD fits within the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

2,352
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in US
54
States with Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
86
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Silva, MD's 18 claims are below the specialty average of 86.

Nearby Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Silva.

Compare Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Virginia medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Silva, MD's specialty?
Amanda Silva, MD specializes in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician and practices in Charlottesville, Virginia. Credentials: MD.
How much does Amanda Silva, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Amanda Silva, MD wrote 18 Medicare Part D claims totaling $763 in drug costs for 14 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Silva, MD's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Silva, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100. The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Silva, MD located?
Amanda Silva, MD is located at 1215 LEE ST, Charlottesville, VA, 22908. Phone: (434) 243-2000.
What is Amanda Silva, MD's NPI number?
Amanda Silva, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1407103880, issued on 08/05/2012.
How many Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 2,352 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider writes 86 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Amanda Silva, MD accept Medicare?
Amanda Silva, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 18 Part D claims and 14 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Silva, MD's credentials?
Amanda Silva, MD's NPI is 1407103880 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.