2026 NPPES data Urology Physician NPI 1396276838 MD
Verify on CMS →

Amanda Swanton, MD

Urology Physician in Iowa City, Iowa.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 13,606 in Urology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
181
Medicare Part D claims · 55 beneficiaries · Urology Physician avg: 1K
MIPS score
99.4/100
▲ 16 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Amanda Swanton, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 99.4/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 181 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

99.4/100
MIPS score · +16 vs avg
181
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥91st
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Amanda Swanton, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1396276838), first enumerated 03/26/2017.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 181 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 99.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1396276838 · Urology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1396276838
  • ENUM-RECENT 2017
  • TAX-MID 14K Urology Physician
  • MIPS-ELITE 99.4/100
  • RX-LIGHT 181
  • BOOK-THIN 118 in Iowa
  • PHOTO-FINISH Timothy Averch · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Amanda Swanton, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

99 ≥ 91st percentile 91% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Amanda Swanton, MD sits

This provider among urology physician peers

Across the 4,091 urology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Amanda Swanton, MD writes more Part D claims than 12% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 88% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Amanda Swanton, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one urology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Amanda Swanton, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Amanda Swanton, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Amanda Swanton, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/26/2017

NPI 1396276838

Primary specialty

Urology Physician

Mid-sized

13,606 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

181 87% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,354

MIPS final score

99.4/100 15.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Iowa

How Urology Physician compares to other specialties among Iowa providers

Iowa providers
Pharmacist6.5%Physical Therapist5.4%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Medicine Physician4.7%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Chiropractor4.1%Urology Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in Iowa (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Amanda Swanton, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Urology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
99.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Urology Physician) - 99.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

200 HAWKINS DR
Iowa City, IA 52242

Provider Details

NPI 1396276838
Specialty Urology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/26/2017

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

99.3791
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
95.6994
Quality
98.9577
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Amanda Swanton, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

State University OF Iowa
Coralville, IA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

181
Total Claims
$14K
Total Drug Cost
55
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
270.8
Total Day Supply
7,490
Generic Drug Cost
$4K
Antibiotic Claims
21

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.28

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Amanda Swanton, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
41
Finasteride
34
Testosterone Cypionate
27
Testosterone
17
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
12
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Urology Physician Overview

How Amanda Swanton, MD fits within the Urology Physician landscape nationally.

13,606
Urology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Urology Physician
1,354
Avg Claims per Provider

Amanda Swanton, MD's 181 claims are below the specialty average of 1,354.

Nationwide Urology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Swanton, both outside Iowa so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (99.4 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2017)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Urology Physician Providers in Iowa

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Iowa, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Swanton.

One of 118 Urology Physician providers enrolled in Iowa, 5 are shown here.

Compare Urology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Amanda Swanton, MD's specialty?
Amanda Swanton, MD specializes in Urology Physician and practices in Iowa City, Iowa. Credentials: MD.
How much does Amanda Swanton, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Amanda Swanton, MD wrote 181 Medicare Part D claims totaling $14K in drug costs for 55 beneficiaries.
What is Amanda Swanton, MD's Medicare quality score?
Amanda Swanton, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 99.4/100 (Quality: 95.7). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Amanda Swanton, MD located?
Amanda Swanton, MD is located at 200 HAWKINS DR, Iowa City, IA, 52242. Phone: (319) 356-2421.
What is Amanda Swanton, MD's NPI number?
Amanda Swanton, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1396276838, issued on 03/26/2017.
How many Urology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 13,606 Urology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Urology Physician provider writes 1,354 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Amanda Swanton, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Amanda Swanton, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Finasteride, Testosterone Cypionate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Amanda Swanton, MD accept Medicare?
Amanda Swanton, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 181 Part D claims and 55 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Amanda Swanton, MD's credentials?
Amanda Swanton, MD's NPI is 1396276838 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.