2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1902048614 FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C

Registered Nurse in Austin, Texas. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 175,652 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
5K
Medicare Part D claims · 209 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 11% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
4.4/100
▼ 79 pts below national avg 83.1 · Penalty band
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 4.4/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 5,499 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

4.4/100
MIPS score · -79 vs avg
5K
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

4 1st percentile higher than 1% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). This entry sits in this band. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Anastasia Davis, FNP-C sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,327 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Anastasia Davis, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 97% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Anastasia Davis, FNP-C-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Anastasia Davis, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Anastasia Davis, FNP-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/26/2009

NPI 1902048614

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

175,652 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

5,499 vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

4.4/100 78.7 pts vs avg

Penalty band band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers

Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician - 5.6%Behavior Technician5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.1%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor - 4.4%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist - 4.4%Pharmacist4.4%Speech-Language Pathologist - 3.9%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Registered Nurse - 2.6%Registered Nurse2.6%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
4.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 4.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%4.4%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 4.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Registered Nurse provider holding FNP-C credentials at 7710 RIALTO BLVD, Austin, TX, 78735, with a listed phone of (512) 288-0859. NPI 1902048614 was issued on 03/26/2009. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Davis most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 5,499 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 209 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $363K in drug spend, split 11% brand-name and 88% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.2%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D, commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 4.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 0, Cost 14.8), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Registered Nurse is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 175,652 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,000 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

7710 RIALTO BLVD
Austin, TX 78735

Provider Details

NPI 1902048614
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/26/2009

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

4.4349
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
0
Quality
14.783
Cost

Reporting: Individual

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Anastasia Davis, FNP-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

N And J Caring, LLC
Castroville, TX
Rise UP Rehab, LLC
San Antonio, TX

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Anastasia Davis, FNP-C. To verify Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C - brand share 11.0%
Registered Nurse average

11% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 5,499 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

5,499
Total Claims
$363K
Total Drug Cost
209
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
6,013
Total Day Supply
164,434
Brand vs Generic
11% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$257K
Generic Drug Cost
$105K
Opioid Claims
68 (1.2% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
211

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
83.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.06
Gender Split
72% female / 28% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Anastasia Davis, FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Levothyroxine Sodium
268
Atorvastatin Calcium
228
Eliquis
Apixaban
164
Donepezil Hcl
163
Furosemide
153
Gabapentin
145
Sertraline Hcl
145
Lisinopril
143
Memantine Hcl
138
Losartan Potassium
135

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Anastasia Davis, FNP-C fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

175,652
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's 5,499 claims are above the specialty average of 1,000.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Davis.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Texas medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's specialty?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Austin, Texas. Credentials: FNP-C.
How much does Anastasia Davis, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Anastasia Davis, FNP-C wrote 5,499 Medicare Part D claims totaling $363K in drug costs for 209 beneficiaries.
What is Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 4.4/100 (Quality: 0, Cost: 14.8). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Anastasia Davis, FNP-C located?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C is located at 7710 RIALTO BLVD, Austin, TX, 78735. Phone: (512) 288-0859.
What is Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's NPI number?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1902048614, issued on 03/26/2009.
Does Anastasia Davis, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's prescribing is 11% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $257K in brand drug costs.
Does Anastasia Davis, FNP-C prescribe opioids?
Yes, Anastasia Davis, FNP-C had 68 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.2%.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 175,652 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Anastasia Davis, FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Levothyroxine Sodium, Atorvastatin Calcium, Eliquis. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Anastasia Davis, FNP-C accept Medicare?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 5,499 Part D claims and 209 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's credentials?
Anastasia Davis, FNP-C's NPI is 1902048614 with credentials FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.