2026 NPPES data Pediatric Nurse Practitioner NPI 1255501987 NP
Verify on CMS →

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner in Appleton, Wisconsin.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 21,156 in Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
81
Medicare Part D claims · Pediatric Nurse Practitioner avg: 312
Generic prescribing
36%
generic claims · 64% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.5/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$110.1
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 81 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

80.5/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
81
Part D claims, 2023
36%
generic prescribing
$110.1
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

81 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Andrea Hilgenberg, NP sits

This provider among pediatric nurse practitioner peers

Across the 147 pediatric nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Andrea Hilgenberg, NP writes more Part D claims than 50% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 41% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Andrea Hilgenberg, NP-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one pediatric nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Andrea Hilgenberg, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Andrea Hilgenberg, NP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/10/2008

NPI 1255501987

Primary specialty

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

21,156 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

81 74% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 312

MIPS final score

80.5/100 2.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Pediatric Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Registered Nurse - 4.5%Registered Nurse4.5%Professional Counselor - 3.3%Professional Counselor3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.3%Family Medicine Physician - 3.2%Family Medicine Physician3.2%Pediatric Nurse Practitioner - 0.3%Pediatric Nurse Practitioner0.3%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Pediatric Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%80.5%
MIPS final score (Pediatric Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner provider holding NP credentials at 2575 E EVERGREEN DRIVE, Appleton, WI, 54913, with a listed phone of (920) 969-5353. NPI 1255501987 was issued on 03/10/2008.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 81 prescription claims written by this provider, covering N/A Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $153K in drug spend, split 64% brand-name and 36% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 80.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 66.2, Cost 68.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 21,156 enrolled providers across 52 states and an average of 312 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

2575 E EVERGREEN DRIVE
Appleton, WI 54913

Provider Details

NPI 1255501987
Specialty Pediatric Nurse Practitioner
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/10/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.4671
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
66.2426
Quality
68.6477
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Andrea Hilgenberg, NP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$110

Largest payer

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP - brand share 64.0%
Pediatric Nurse Practitioner average

64% brand-name claims vs 36% generic, on 81 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

81
Total Claims
$153K
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
102
Total Day Supply
2,799
Brand vs Generic
64% brand / 36% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$152K
Generic Drug Cost
$429

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
51.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.23

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Andrea Hilgenberg, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Montelukast Sodium
14
Nucala
Mepolizumab
12
Xolair
Omalizumab
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Andrea Hilgenberg, NP fits within the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

21,156
Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
52
States with Pediatric Nurse Practitioner
312
Avg Claims per Provider

Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's 81 claims are below the specialty average of 312.

Nearby Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Hilgenberg.

Compare Pediatric Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Wisconsin medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Pediatric Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's specialty?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP specializes in Pediatric Nurse Practitioner and practices in Appleton, Wisconsin. Credentials: NP.
How much does Andrea Hilgenberg, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Andrea Hilgenberg, NP wrote 81 Medicare Part D claims totaling $153K in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's Medicare quality score?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.5/100 (Quality: 66.2, Cost: 68.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Andrea Hilgenberg, NP located?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP is located at 2575 E EVERGREEN DRIVE, Appleton, WI, 54913. Phone: (920) 969-5353.
What is Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's NPI number?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1255501987, issued on 03/10/2008.
Does Andrea Hilgenberg, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's prescribing is 64% brand-name and 36% generic drugs by claim count, with $152K in brand drug costs.
How many Pediatric Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 21,156 Pediatric Nurse Practitioner providers across 52 states in the US. The average Pediatric Nurse Practitioner provider writes 312 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Andrea Hilgenberg, NP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Montelukast Sodium, Nucala, Xolair. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Andrea Hilgenberg, NP accept Medicare?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 81 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's credentials?
Andrea Hilgenberg, NP's NPI is 1255501987 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.