2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1316541956
Verify on CMS →

Andrea Strong

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,706 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 387 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
80.5/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$2.3K
13 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Andrea Strong reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,554 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

80.5/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
$2.3K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Andrea Strong's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

81 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Andrea Strong sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,301 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Andrea Strong writes more Part D claims than 76% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 33% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Andrea Strong-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 76 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Andrea Strong. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Andrea Strong?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/24/2020

NPI 1316541956

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,706 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,554 21% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,283

MIPS final score

80.5/100 2.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Registered Nurse - 4.5%Registered Nurse4.5%Professional Counselor - 3.3%Professional Counselor3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.3%Family Medicine Physician - 3.2%Family Medicine Physician3.2%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner - 0.1%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner0.1%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Andrea Strong's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%80.5%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Andrea Strong appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider at 9200 W WISCONSIN AVE, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, with a listed phone of (414) 805-0805. NPI 1316541956 was issued on 11/24/2020.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,554 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 387 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $350K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 80.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 66.2, Cost 68.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 9,706 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,283 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

9200 W WISCONSIN AVE
Milwaukee, WI 53226

Provider Details

NPI 1316541956
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/24/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.4671
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
66.2426
Quality
68.6477
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Andrea Strong. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$2.3K

Largest payer

HOLLISTER INCORPORATED

Most common payment type

Travel and Lodging

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,554
Total Claims
$350K
Total Drug Cost
387
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,361
Total Day Supply
63,435
Generic Drug Cost
$41K
Antibiotic Claims
253

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.34
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male
Age Distribution
<65: 92, 65-74: 153, 75-84: 99, 85+: 43

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Andrea Strong prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
344
Tamsulosin Hcl
302
Gemtesa
Vibegron
141
Estradiol
88
Finasteride
85
Solifenacin Succinate
72
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
64
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
51
Methenamine Hippurate
51
Alfuzosin Hcl Er
Alfuzosin Hcl
48

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Andrea Strong fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,706
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,283
Avg Claims per Provider

Andrea Strong's 1,554 claims are above the specialty average of 1,283.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Strong.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Wisconsin medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Andrea Strong's specialty?
Andrea Strong specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
How much does Andrea Strong prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Andrea Strong wrote 1,554 Medicare Part D claims totaling $350K in drug costs for 387 beneficiaries.
What is Andrea Strong's Medicare quality score?
Andrea Strong has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.5/100 (Quality: 66.2, Cost: 68.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Andrea Strong located?
Andrea Strong is located at 9200 W WISCONSIN AVE, Milwaukee, WI, 53226. Phone: (414) 805-0805.
What is Andrea Strong's NPI number?
Andrea Strong's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1316541956, issued on 11/24/2020.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 9,706 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,283 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Andrea Strong prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Andrea Strong's most frequently prescribed drugs include Myrbetriq, Tamsulosin Hcl, Gemtesa. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Andrea Strong accept Medicare?
Andrea Strong appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,554 Part D claims and 387 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Andrea Strong's credentials?
Andrea Strong's NPI is 1316541956. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.