2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1356060677 FNP-BC
Verify on CMS →

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC

Registered Nurse in Newport, Vermont.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 177,204 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 184 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
87%
generic claims · 13% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
90.1/100
▲ 7 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 90.1/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,854 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

90.1/100
MIPS score · +7 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
87%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

90 Top 40% higher than 60% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,327 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC writes more Part D claims than 84% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 60% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 84 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/22/2022

NPI 1356060677

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

177,204 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,854 85% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

90.1/100 7 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Vermont

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Vermont providers

Vermont providers
Mental Health Counselor - 9.5%Mental Health Counselor9.5%Clinical Social Worker - 7.8%Clinical Social Worker7.8%Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.6%Pharmacist - 3.8%Pharmacist3.8%Family Medicine Physician - 2.8%Family Medicine Physician2.8%Registered Nurse - 1.6%Registered Nurse1.6%
Largest specialties in Vermont (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
90.1/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 90.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%90.1%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 90.1/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Registered Nurse provider holding FNP-BC credentials at 186 MEDICAL VILLAGE DR, Newport, VT, 05855, with a listed phone of (802) 334-4120. NPI 1356060677 was issued on 08/22/2022.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,854 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 184 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $206K in drug spend, split 13% brand-name and 87% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.8%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 90.1/100 for the 2023 performance year, compared with the national average of 83.1.

Registered Nurse is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 177,204 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,000 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

186 MEDICAL VILLAGE DR
Newport, VT 05855

Provider Details

NPI 1356060677
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials FNP-BC
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/22/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

90.0519
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
50.173
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

North Country Hospital And Health Center Inc
Newport, VT
Northern Counties Health Care Inc
Danville, VT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC - brand share 13.0%
Registered Nurse average

13% brand-name claims vs 87% generic, on 1,854 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,854
Total Claims
$206K
Total Drug Cost
184
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,662
Total Day Supply
104,669
Brand vs Generic
13% brand / 87% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$165K
Generic Drug Cost
$41K
Opioid Claims
15 (0.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
64

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.83
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male
Age Distribution
<65: 44, 65-74: 92, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
126
Lisinopril
89
Metoprolol Succinate
84
Omeprazole
83
Simvastatin
73
Amlodipine Besylate
55
Losartan Potassium
48
Hydrochlorothiazide
45
Fluticasone Propionate
43
Levothyroxine Sodium
40

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

177,204
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's 1,854 claims are above the specialty average of 1,000.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Vermont

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Vermont, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Van Woert.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Vermont medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's specialty?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Newport, Vermont. Credentials: FNP-BC.
How much does Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC wrote 1,854 Medicare Part D claims totaling $206K in drug costs for 184 beneficiaries.
What is Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's Medicare quality score?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 90.1/100, Cost: 50.2. The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC located?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC is located at 186 MEDICAL VILLAGE DR, Newport, VT, 05855. Phone: (802) 334-4120.
What is Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's NPI number?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356060677, issued on 08/22/2022.
Does Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's prescribing is 13% brand-name and 87% generic drugs by claim count, with $165K in brand drug costs.
Does Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC prescribe opioids?
Yes, Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC had 15 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.8%.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 177,204 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Lisinopril, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC accept Medicare?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,854 Part D claims and 184 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's credentials?
Andrea Van Woert, FNP-BC's NPI is 1356060677 with credentials FNP-BC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.