2026 NPPES data Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician NPI 1447519541 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Andrew Chon, M.D.

Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician in Murray, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 2,190 in Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
48
Medicare Part D claims · 31 beneficiaries · Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician avg: 81
MIPS score
97.8/100
▲ 14 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$27.05
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Andrew Chon, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.8/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 48 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

97.8/100
MIPS score · +14 vs avg
48
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥84th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Andrew Chon, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1447519541), first enumerated 05/09/2012.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 48 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $27.05 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1447519541 · Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ELITE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1447519541
  • ENUM-MID 2012
  • TAX-NARROW 2,190
  • MIPS-ELITE 97.8/100
  • RX-TRACE 48
  • BOOK-THIN 27 in Utah
  • PHOTO-FINISH Karen Gibbins, MD · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Andrew Chon, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

98 ≥ 84th percentile 84% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Andrew Chon, M.D. sits

This provider among maternal & fetal medicine physician peers

Across the 54 maternal & fetal medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Andrew Chon, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 83% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 85% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.749.474.098.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 89 · MIPS quality, percentile: 49Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 89Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 81 · MIPS quality, percentile: 9Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 89Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 79Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 79Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 89Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 19 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 66Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 6Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 74Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 79 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 36Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 66Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 94 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 34Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 19 · MIPS quality, percentile: 19Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 96 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 21Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 51Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 26Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 19 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 66 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Andrew Chon, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one maternal & fetal medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 53; the gold marker is Andrew Chon, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Andrew Chon, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Andrew Chon, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/09/2012

NPI 1447519541

Primary specialty

Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician

Niche

2,190 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

48 41% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 81

MIPS final score

97.8/100 14.3 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician13%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.7%Counselor4.7%Student in an Organized Heal…4.5%Maternal & Fetal Medicine Ph…0%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Andrew Chon, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
97.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%97.8%
MIPS final score (Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician) - 97.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

5121 S COTTONWOOD ST STE 170
Murray, UT 84107

Provider Details

NPI 1447519541
Specialty Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/09/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

97.83
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
80.9759
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Andrew Chon, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University Professional Services
The Dalles, OR

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Andrew Chon, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$27

Largest payer

Geistlich Pharma, North America, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

48
Total Claims
$1K
Total Drug Cost
31
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
48
Total Day Supply
767
Generic Drug Cost
$404
Antibiotic Claims
12

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
66.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.33

Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician Overview

How Andrew Chon, M.D. fits within the Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

2,190
Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician Providers in US
52
States with Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician
81
Avg Claims per Provider

Andrew Chon, M.D.'s 48 claims are below the specialty average of 81.

Nationwide Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Chon, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (97.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2012)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Chon.

One of 27 Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician providers enrolled in Utah, 5 are shown here.

Compare Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Andrew Chon, M.D.'s specialty?
Andrew Chon, M.D. specializes in Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician and practices in Murray, Utah. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Andrew Chon, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Andrew Chon, M.D. wrote 48 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1K in drug costs for 31 beneficiaries.
What is Andrew Chon, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Andrew Chon, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 97.8/100 (Quality: 81). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Andrew Chon, M.D. located?
Andrew Chon, M.D. is located at 5121 S COTTONWOOD ST STE 170, Murray, UT, 84107. Phone: (801) 507-7400.
What is Andrew Chon, M.D.'s NPI number?
Andrew Chon, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1447519541, issued on 05/09/2012.
How many Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 2,190 Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician providers across 52 states in the US. The average Maternal & Fetal Medicine Physician provider writes 81 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Andrew Chon, M.D. accept Medicare?
Andrew Chon, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 48 Part D claims and 31 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Andrew Chon, M.D.'s credentials?
Andrew Chon, M.D.'s NPI is 1447519541 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.