2026 NPPES data Radiation Oncology Physician NPI 1679501456 MD
Verify on CMS →

Andrew Tanner, MD

Radiation Oncology Physician in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,141 in Radiation Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
59
Medicare Part D claims · 27 beneficiaries · Radiation Oncology Physician avg: 135
MIPS score
77.2/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$65.1
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Andrew Tanner, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 59 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

77.2/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
59
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥20th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Andrew Tanner, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1679501456), first enumerated 06/29/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 59 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $65.1 in reported industry payments (3 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1679501456 · Radiation Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1679501456
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 6K Radiation Oncology
  • MIPS-BELOW 77.2/100
  • RX-TRACE 59
  • BOOK-THIN 104 in Colorado
  • PHOTO-FINISH Darlene Bugoci · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Andrew Tanner, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

77 ≥ 20th percentile 20% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Andrew Tanner, MD sits

This provider among radiation oncology physician peers

Across the 1,834 radiation oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Andrew Tanner, MD writes more Part D claims than 33% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 18% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.845.768.591.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Andrew Tanner, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one radiation oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Andrew Tanner, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Andrew Tanner, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Andrew Tanner, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/29/2006

NPI 1679501456

Primary specialty

Radiation Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

6,141 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

59 56% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 135

MIPS final score

77.2/100 6.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Colorado

How Radiation Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Colorado providers

Colorado providers
Behavior Technician8.2%Mental Health Counselor6.1%Clinical Social Worker4.3%Physical Therapist4.2%Professional Counselor3.7%Registered Nurse3.6%Radiation Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Colorado (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Andrew Tanner, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Radiation Oncology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
77.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%77.2%
MIPS final score (Radiation Oncology Physician) - 77.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2222 N NEVADA AVE
Colorado Springs, CO 80907

Provider Details

NPI 1679501456
Specialty Radiation Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/29/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.1751
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
80.2782
Quality
59.4721
Cost
81
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Andrew Tanner, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Portercare Adventist Health System
Littleton, CO

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Andrew Tanner, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$65

Largest payer

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

59
Total Claims
$696
Total Drug Cost
27
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
76
Total Day Supply
1,602
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$696
Opioid Claims
14 (23.7% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.84
Gender Split
44% female / 56% male
Age Distribution
<65: 0, 65-74: N/A, 75-84: 13, 85+: N/A

Radiation Oncology Physician Overview

How Andrew Tanner, MD fits within the Radiation Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

6,141
Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Radiation Oncology Physician
135
Avg Claims per Provider

Andrew Tanner, MD's 59 claims are below the specialty average of 135.

Nationwide Radiation Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Tanner, both outside Colorado so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (77.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in Colorado

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Colorado, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Tanner.

One of 104 Radiation Oncology Physician providers enrolled in Colorado, 5 are shown here.

Compare Radiation Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Andrew Tanner, MD's specialty?
Andrew Tanner, MD specializes in Radiation Oncology Physician and practices in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Credentials: MD.
How much does Andrew Tanner, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Andrew Tanner, MD wrote 59 Medicare Part D claims totaling $696 in drug costs for 27 beneficiaries.
What is Andrew Tanner, MD's Medicare quality score?
Andrew Tanner, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 77.2/100 (Quality: 80.3, Cost: 59.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Andrew Tanner, MD located?
Andrew Tanner, MD is located at 2222 N NEVADA AVE, Colorado Springs, CO, 80907. Phone: (719) 776-5281.
What is Andrew Tanner, MD's NPI number?
Andrew Tanner, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1679501456, issued on 06/29/2006.
Does Andrew Tanner, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Andrew Tanner, MD had 14 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 23.7%.
How many Radiation Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 6,141 Radiation Oncology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Radiation Oncology Physician provider writes 135 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Andrew Tanner, MD accept Medicare?
Andrew Tanner, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 59 Part D claims and 27 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Andrew Tanner, MD's credentials?
Andrew Tanner, MD's NPI is 1679501456 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.