2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1063067981
Verify on CMS →

Angela Score

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Burnsville, Minnesota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,706 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 242 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 11% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
86/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Angela Score reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 4,161 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

86/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Angela Score's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

86 Top 48% higher than 52% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Angela Score sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,301 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Angela Score writes more Part D claims than 93% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 53% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Angela Score-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Angela Score. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Angela Score?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/07/2019

NPI 1063067981

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,706 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

4,161 224% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,283

MIPS final score

86/100 2.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Minnesota

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Minnesota providers

Minnesota providers
Behavior Technician - 11.7%Behavior Technician11.7%Clinical Social Worker - 4.7%Clinical Social Worker4.7%Physical Therapist - 4.1%Physical Therapist4.1%Pharmacist - 3.7%Pharmacist3.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.4%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.4%Mental Health Counselor - 3.1%Mental Health Counselor3.1%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner - 0.2%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner0.2%
Largest specialties in Minnesota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Angela Score's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 86/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%86%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 86/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Angela Score appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider at 14000 FAIRVIEW DR, Burnsville, MN, 55337, with a listed phone of (612) 341-4800. NPI 1063067981 was issued on 08/07/2019.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 4,161 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 242 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $269K in drug spend, split 11% brand-name and 88% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 86/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 84, Cost 49.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 9,706 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,283 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

14000 FAIRVIEW DR
Burnsville, MN 55337

Provider Details

NPI 1063067981
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/07/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.0462
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
83.975
Quality
49.5333
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Angela Score bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Park Nicollet Clinic
Bloomington, MN
Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation
Minneapolis, MN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Angela Score - brand share 11.0%
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner average

11% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 4,161 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

4,161
Total Claims
$269K
Total Drug Cost
242
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,208
Total Day Supply
97,914
Brand vs Generic
11% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$201K
Generic Drug Cost
$66K
Antibiotic Claims
71

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
79.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.86
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male
Age Distribution
<65: 21, 65-74: 58, 75-84: 74, 85+: 89

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Angela Score prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
209
Levothyroxine Sodium
147
Amlodipine Besylate
145
Gabapentin
145
Lisinopril
139
Furosemide
112
Omeprazole
106
Metoprolol Tartrate
100
Escitalopram Oxalate
97
Trazodone Hcl
93

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Angela Score fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,706
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,283
Avg Claims per Provider

Angela Score's 4,161 claims are above the specialty average of 1,283.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Minnesota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Minnesota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Score.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Minnesota medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Angela Score's specialty?
Angela Score specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Burnsville, Minnesota.
How much does Angela Score prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Angela Score wrote 4,161 Medicare Part D claims totaling $269K in drug costs for 242 beneficiaries.
What is Angela Score's Medicare quality score?
Angela Score has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86/100 (Quality: 84, Cost: 49.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Angela Score located?
Angela Score is located at 14000 FAIRVIEW DR, Burnsville, MN, 55337. Phone: (612) 341-4800.
What is Angela Score's NPI number?
Angela Score's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1063067981, issued on 08/07/2019.
Does Angela Score prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Angela Score's prescribing is 11% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $201K in brand drug costs.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 9,706 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,283 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Angela Score prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Angela Score's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Levothyroxine Sodium, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Angela Score accept Medicare?
Angela Score appears in CMS Medicare data with 4,161 Part D claims and 242 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Angela Score's credentials?
Angela Score's NPI is 1063067981. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.