PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1962158022
Verify on CMS →

Anna Kingrey

Nurse Practitioner in Charleston, South Carolina.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 89,808 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
24
Medicare Part D claims · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
73.8/100
▼ 10 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Anna Kingrey reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 24 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

73.8/100
MIPS score · -10 vs avg
24
Part D claims, 2024
≥11th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Anna Kingrey

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1962158022), first enumerated 02/28/2022.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 24 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1962158022 · Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1962158022
  • ENUM-RECENT 2022
  • TAX-MEGA 90K Nurse Practitioner
  • MIPS-BELOW 73.8/100
  • RX-TRACE 24
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,260 in South Carolina
  • PHOTO-FINISH Robert Duffield, ARNP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Anna Kingrey's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

74 ≥ 11th percentile 11% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Anna Kingrey sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,205 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Anna Kingrey writes more Part D claims than 5% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 11% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Anna Kingrey, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Anna Kingrey. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Anna Kingrey?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/28/2022

NPI 1962158022

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

89,808 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

24 98% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,144

MIPS final score

73.8/100 9.7 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Carolina

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among South Carolina providers

South Carolina providers
Pharmacist6.1%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Physical Therapist4.5%Behavior Technician4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist3.6%Nurse Practitioner1.5%
Largest specialties in South Carolina (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Anna Kingrey's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
73.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%73.8%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 73.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

171 ASHLEY AVE
Charleston, SC 29425
(843) 792-1414

Provider Details

NPI 1962158022
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 02/28/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

73.8449
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
60.2834
Quality
53.3663
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

24
Total Claims
$356
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
26
Total Day Supply
429
Generic Drug Cost
$355

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
60.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.21
More Nurse Practitioner in SC → All providers in South Carolina → Compare specialties →

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Anna Kingrey fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

89,808
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,144
Avg Claims per Provider

Anna Kingrey's 24 claims are below the specialty average of 1,144.

Nationwide Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Kingrey, both outside South Carolina so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (73.8 here).

Season Davis 73.8 IN Nicole McCauley 73.8 OH Robert Duffield 73.8 FL Ella Edwards 73.9 IL

Same NPPES enumeration year (2022)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Jasmine Hinchman Farmington, NM Amy Cope Geneva, IL Brandilyn Davis Mountain Home, AR Ifeanyi Ofokansi Owings Mills, MD

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in South Carolina

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Carolina, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kingrey.

One of 1,260 Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in South Carolina, 5 are shown here.

Connie Abbott
ARNP BC
Due West, SC
Margaret Acres
APRN
Greenville, SC
Erica Adams
FNP-BC
Lancaster, SC
Jeremy Adams
FNP-C
Fort Mill, SC
Mary Adler
NP
Charleston, SC

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anna Kingrey's specialty? ▼
Anna Kingrey specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Charleston, South Carolina.
How much does Anna Kingrey prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Anna Kingrey wrote 24 Medicare Part D claims totaling $356 in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Anna Kingrey's Medicare quality score? ▼
Anna Kingrey has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 73.8/100 (Quality: 60.3, Cost: 53.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Anna Kingrey located? ▼
Anna Kingrey is located at 171 ASHLEY AVE, Charleston, SC, 29425. Phone: (843) 792-1414.
What is Anna Kingrey's NPI number? ▼
Anna Kingrey's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1962158022, issued on 02/28/2022.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 89,808 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,144 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Anna Kingrey accept Medicare? ▼
Anna Kingrey appears in CMS Medicare data with 24 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Anna Kingrey's credentials? ▼
Anna Kingrey's NPI is 1962158022. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.