2026 NPPES data Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician NPI 1083811186 MD
Verify on CMS →

Anna Pilzek, MD

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician in Mount Vernon, Washington.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 44,326 in Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
431
Medicare Part D claims · 214 beneficiaries · Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician avg: 179
Generic prescribing
55%
generic claims · 45% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
84.5/100
▲ 1 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$500.38
19 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Anna Pilzek, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.5/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 431 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

84.5/100
MIPS score · +1 vs avg
431
Part D claims, 2023
55%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Anna Pilzek, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1083811186), first enumerated 07/02/2007.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 431 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $500.38 in reported industry payments (19 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Washington statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Anna Pilzek, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: WMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1083811186 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1083811186
  • ENUM-MID 2007
  • TAX-MID 44K Obstetrics &
  • MIPS-INLINE 84.5/100
  • RX-LIGHT 431
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,006 in Washington
  • PHOTO-FINISH Adam Steinberg · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Anna Pilzek, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

85 ≥ 42nd percentile 42% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Anna Pilzek, MD sits

This provider among obstetrics & gynecology physician peers

Across the 7,360 obstetrics & gynecology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Anna Pilzek, MD writes more Part D claims than 91% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 42% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Anna Pilzek, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one obstetrics & gynecology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Anna Pilzek, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Anna Pilzek, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Anna Pilzek, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/02/2007

NPI 1083811186

Primary specialty

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician

Mid-sized

44,326 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

431 141% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 179

MIPS final score

84.5/100 1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers
Mental Health Counselor8.6%Massage Therapist6.5%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician4.5%Pharmacist4%Physical Therapist3.6%Obstetrics & Gynecology Phys…0.5%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Anna Pilzek, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
84.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%84.5%
MIPS final score (Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician) - 84.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1400 E KINCAID ST
Mount Vernon, WA 98274

Provider Details

NPI 1083811186
Specialty Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/02/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

84.4788
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
79.2865
Quality
59.5997
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Anna Pilzek, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Public Hospital Dist NO 1 Skagit
Mount Vernon, WA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Anna Pilzek, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$500

Largest payer

IMMUNITYBIO, INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Anna Pilzek, MD. To verify Anna Pilzek, MD's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Anna Pilzek, MD - brand share 45.0%
Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician average

45% brand-name claims vs 55% generic, on 431 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

431
Total Claims
$93K
Total Drug Cost
214
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
730
Total Day Supply
18,377
Brand vs Generic
45% brand / 55% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$80K
Generic Drug Cost
$13K
Opioid Claims
23 (5.3% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
109

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.35
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 19, 65-74: 90, 75-84: 82, 85+: 23

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Anna Pilzek, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
127
Estradiol
126
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
85
Tramadol Hcl
18
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
14
Ibuprofen
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Overview

How Anna Pilzek, MD fits within the Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician landscape nationally.

44,326
Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Providers in US
56
States with Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician
179
Avg Claims per Provider

Anna Pilzek, MD's 431 claims are above the specialty average of 179.

Nationwide Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Pilzek, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (84.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2007)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Pilzek.

One of 1,006 Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers enrolled in Washington, 5 are shown here.

Compare Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anna Pilzek, MD's specialty?
Anna Pilzek, MD specializes in Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician and practices in Mount Vernon, Washington. Credentials: MD.
How much does Anna Pilzek, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Anna Pilzek, MD wrote 431 Medicare Part D claims totaling $93K in drug costs for 214 beneficiaries.
What is Anna Pilzek, MD's Medicare quality score?
Anna Pilzek, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 84.5/100 (Quality: 79.3, Cost: 59.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Anna Pilzek, MD located?
Anna Pilzek, MD is located at 1400 E KINCAID ST, Mount Vernon, WA, 98274. Phone: (360) 428-6471.
What is Anna Pilzek, MD's NPI number?
Anna Pilzek, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1083811186, issued on 07/02/2007.
Does Anna Pilzek, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Anna Pilzek, MD's prescribing is 45% brand-name and 55% generic drugs by claim count, with $80K in brand drug costs.
Does Anna Pilzek, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Anna Pilzek, MD had 23 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 5.3%.
How many Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 44,326 Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician provider writes 179 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Anna Pilzek, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Anna Pilzek, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Myrbetriq, Estradiol, Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Anna Pilzek, MD accept Medicare?
Anna Pilzek, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 431 Part D claims and 214 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Anna Pilzek, MD's credentials?
Anna Pilzek, MD's NPI is 1083811186 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.