2026 NPPES data Pain Medicine Physician NPI 1033141643 MD
Verify on CMS →

Anthony Eidelman, MD

Pain Medicine Physician in Rochester, New York. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 951 in Pain Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 250 beneficiaries · Pain Medicine Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
90%
generic claims · 10% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.1/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Anthony Eidelman, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.1/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,333 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

81.1/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
90%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Anthony Eidelman, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

81 36th percentile higher than 36% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Anthony Eidelman, MD sits

This provider among pain medicine physician peers

Across the 286 pain medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Anthony Eidelman, MD writes more Part D claims than 45% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 53% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Anthony Eidelman, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one pain medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Anthony Eidelman, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Anthony Eidelman, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Anthony Eidelman, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/06/2006

NPI 1033141643

Primary specialty

Pain Medicine Physician

Niche

951 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,333 36% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,078

MIPS final score

81.1/100 2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Pain Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers

Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse - 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker - 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker - 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Pain Medicine Physician - 0%Pain Medicine Physician0%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Anthony Eidelman, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Pain Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.1/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Pain Medicine Physician) - 81.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%81.1%
MIPS final score (Pain Medicine Physician) - 81.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Anthony Eidelman, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Pain Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 2180 S CLINTON AVE, Rochester, NY, 14618, with a listed phone of (585) 276-2616. NPI 1033141643 was issued on 07/06/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Eidelman most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,333 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 250 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $150K in drug spend, split 10% brand-name and 90% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 40.5%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D, commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 81.1/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 63.7, Cost 60.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Pain Medicine Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 951 enrolled providers across 49 states and an average of 2,078 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

2180 S CLINTON AVE
Rochester, NY 14618

Provider Details

NPI 1033141643
Specialty Pain Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.1069
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
63.6753
Quality
60.698
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Anthony Eidelman, MD. To verify Anthony Eidelman, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Anthony Eidelman, MD - brand share 10.0%
Pain Medicine Physician average

10% brand-name claims vs 90% generic, on 1,333 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,333
Total Claims
$150K
Total Drug Cost
250
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,442
Total Day Supply
38,234
Brand vs Generic
10% brand / 90% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$72K
Generic Drug Cost
$78K
Opioid Claims
540 (40.5% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.36
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male
Age Distribution
<65: 66, 65-74: 93, 75-84: 70, 85+: 21

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Anthony Eidelman, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Gabapentin
144
Tramadol Hcl
131
Buprenorphine
130
Pregabalin
106
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
94
Buprenorphine-Naloxone
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
84
Oxycodone Hcl
71
Duloxetine Hcl
70
Buprenorphine Hcl
54
Methocarbamol
38

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Pain Medicine Physician Overview

How Anthony Eidelman, MD fits within the Pain Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

951
Pain Medicine Physician Providers in US
49
States with Pain Medicine Physician
2,078
Avg Claims per Provider

Anthony Eidelman, MD's 1,333 claims are below the specialty average of 2,078.

Nearby Pain Medicine Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Eidelman.

Compare Pain Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Pain Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anthony Eidelman, MD's specialty?
Anthony Eidelman, MD specializes in Pain Medicine Physician and practices in Rochester, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does Anthony Eidelman, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Anthony Eidelman, MD wrote 1,333 Medicare Part D claims totaling $150K in drug costs for 250 beneficiaries.
What is Anthony Eidelman, MD's Medicare quality score?
Anthony Eidelman, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.1/100 (Quality: 63.7, Cost: 60.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Anthony Eidelman, MD located?
Anthony Eidelman, MD is located at 2180 S CLINTON AVE, Rochester, NY, 14618. Phone: (585) 276-2616.
What is Anthony Eidelman, MD's NPI number?
Anthony Eidelman, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1033141643, issued on 07/06/2006.
Does Anthony Eidelman, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Anthony Eidelman, MD's prescribing is 10% brand-name and 90% generic drugs by claim count, with $72K in brand drug costs.
Does Anthony Eidelman, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Anthony Eidelman, MD had 540 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 40.5%.
How many Pain Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 951 Pain Medicine Physician providers across 49 states in the US. The average Pain Medicine Physician provider writes 2,078 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Anthony Eidelman, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Anthony Eidelman, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Gabapentin, Tramadol Hcl, Buprenorphine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Anthony Eidelman, MD accept Medicare?
Anthony Eidelman, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,333 Part D claims and 250 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Anthony Eidelman, MD's credentials?
Anthony Eidelman, MD's NPI is 1033141643 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.