2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1477106326 NP
Verify on CMS →

Ashika Thanju, NP

Registered Nurse in Bakersfield, California.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 185,440 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 467 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
85%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.2/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$564.58
19 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Ashika Thanju, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,725 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

81.2/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
85%
generic prescribing
$564.58
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Ashika Thanju, NP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1477106326), first enumerated 07/19/2019.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,725 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $564.58 in reported industry payments (19 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    California statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Ashika Thanju, NP's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MBC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1477106326 · Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1477106326
  • ENUM-RECENT 2019
  • TAX-MEGA 185K Registered Nurse
  • MIPS-INLINE 81.2/100
  • RX-MID 1,725
  • BOOK-MID 16,593 in California
  • PHOTO-FINISH Shelly Barlow · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Ashika Thanju, NP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 32nd percentile 32% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Ashika Thanju, NP sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Ashika Thanju, NP writes more Part D claims than 83% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 30% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Ashika Thanju, NP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Ashika Thanju, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Ashika Thanju, NP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/19/2019

NPI 1477106326

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

185,440 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,725 62% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,063

MIPS final score

81.2/100 2.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers
Behavior Technician17.9%Marriage & Family Therapist5.4%Student in an Organized Heal…5.1%Mental Health Counselor3.7%Pharmacist3.4%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Registered Nurse1.7%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Ashika Thanju, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%81.2%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3838 SAN DIMAS ST STE B201
Bakersfield, CA 93301

Provider Details

NPI 1477106326
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/19/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.234
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
68.9532
Quality
68.4936
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Ashika Thanju, NP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$565

Largest payer

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Ashika Thanju, NP. To verify Ashika Thanju, NP's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Ashika Thanju, NP - brand share 15.0%
Registered Nurse average

15% brand-name claims vs 85% generic, on 1,725 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,725
Total Claims
$253K
Total Drug Cost
467
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,423.567
Total Day Supply
131,743
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 85% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$233K
Generic Drug Cost
$21K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.64
Gender Split
45% female / 55% male
Age Distribution
<65: 34, 65-74: 199, 75-84: 170, 85+: 64

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Ashika Thanju, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
160
Metoprolol Succinate
134
Eliquis
Apixaban
118
Carvedilol
101
Amlodipine Besylate
95
Furosemide
81
Lisinopril
72
Rosuvastatin Calcium
65
Losartan Potassium
62
Isosorbide Mononitrate Er
Isosorbide Mononitrate
56

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Ashika Thanju, NP fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

185,440
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,063
Avg Claims per Provider

Ashika Thanju, NP's 1,725 claims are above the specialty average of 1,063.

Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Thanju, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (81.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2019)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Thanju.

One of 16,593 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in California, 5 are shown here.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ashika Thanju, NP's specialty?
Ashika Thanju, NP specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Bakersfield, California. Credentials: NP.
How much does Ashika Thanju, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Ashika Thanju, NP wrote 1,725 Medicare Part D claims totaling $253K in drug costs for 467 beneficiaries.
What is Ashika Thanju, NP's Medicare quality score?
Ashika Thanju, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.2/100 (Quality: 69, Cost: 68.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Ashika Thanju, NP located?
Ashika Thanju, NP is located at 3838 SAN DIMAS ST STE B201, Bakersfield, CA, 93301. Phone: (661) 506-1431.
What is Ashika Thanju, NP's NPI number?
Ashika Thanju, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1477106326, issued on 07/19/2019.
Does Ashika Thanju, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Ashika Thanju, NP's prescribing is 15% brand-name and 85% generic drugs by claim count, with $233K in brand drug costs.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 185,440 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,063 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Ashika Thanju, NP prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Ashika Thanju, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Metoprolol Succinate, Eliquis. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Ashika Thanju, NP accept Medicare?
Ashika Thanju, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,725 Part D claims and 467 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Ashika Thanju, NP's credentials?
Ashika Thanju, NP's NPI is 1477106326 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.