2026 NPPES data Dermatopathology Physician NPI 1467847905 MD
Verify on CMS →

Ashley Elsensohn, MD

Dermatopathology Physician in Loma Linda, California.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 577 in Dermatopathology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
830
Medicare Part D claims · 296 beneficiaries · Dermatopathology Physician avg: 695
Generic prescribing
81%
generic claims · 19% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
85.2/100
▲ 2 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Ashley Elsensohn, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 85.2/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 830 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

85.2/100
MIPS score · +2 vs avg
830
Part D claims, 2024
81%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Ashley Elsensohn, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1467847905), first enumerated 04/01/2015.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 830 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 85.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    3 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    California statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Ashley Elsensohn, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MBC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1467847905 · Dermatopathology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1467847905
  • ENUM-MID 2015
  • TAX-NARROW 577
  • MIPS-INLINE 85.2/100
  • RX-LIGHT 830
  • BOOK-THIN 71 in California
  • PHOTO-FINISH Janine Mangini, M.D. · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Ashley Elsensohn, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

85 ≥ 46th percentile 46% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Ashley Elsensohn, MD sits

This provider among dermatopathology physician peers

Across the 185 dermatopathology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Ashley Elsensohn, MD writes more Part D claims than 70% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 41% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100018.937.856.775.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Ashley Elsensohn, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one dermatopathology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Ashley Elsensohn, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Ashley Elsensohn, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 3 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Ashley Elsensohn, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/01/2015

NPI 1467847905

Primary specialty

Dermatopathology Physician

Niche

577 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

830 19% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 695

MIPS final score

85.2/100 1.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Dermatopathology Physician compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers
Behavior Technician17.9%Marriage & Family Therapist5.4%Student in an Organized Heal…5.1%Mental Health Counselor3.7%Pharmacist3.4%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Dermatopathology Physician0%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Ashley Elsensohn, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Dermatopathology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
85.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%85.2%
MIPS final score (Dermatopathology Physician) - 85.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

25865 BARTON RD STE 101
Loma Linda, CA 92354

Provider Details

NPI 1467847905
Specialty Dermatopathology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/01/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

85.186
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
71.8166
Quality
64.5435
Cost
82
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Ashley Elsensohn, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Ashley Elsensohn, MD is affiliated with 3 Medicare-billing facilities.

Faculty Physicians And Surgeons OF Llusm
Loma Linda, CA
Focus Dermatopathology Inc
Tustin, CA
Loma Linda University Pathology Medical Group, Inc
Loma Linda, CA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Ashley Elsensohn, MD. To verify Ashley Elsensohn, MD's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Ashley Elsensohn, MD - brand share 19.0%
Dermatopathology Physician average

19% brand-name claims vs 81% generic, on 830 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

830
Total Claims
$301K
Total Drug Cost
296
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,014.733
Total Day Supply
26,140
Brand vs Generic
19% brand / 81% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$278K
Generic Drug Cost
$24K
Antibiotic Claims
116

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.63
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male
Age Distribution
<65: 27, 65-74: 129, 75-84: 104, 85+: 36

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Ashley Elsensohn, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ketoconazole
114
Doxycycline Hyclate
88
Ssd
Silver Sulfadiazine
69
Fluorouracil
61
Mupirocin
49
Silver Sulfadiazine
37
Minoxidil
34
Triamcinolone Acetonide
34
Fluocinonide
32
Dupixent Pen
Dupilumab
21

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Dermatopathology Physician Overview

How Ashley Elsensohn, MD fits within the Dermatopathology Physician landscape nationally.

577
Dermatopathology Physician Providers in US
48
States with Dermatopathology Physician
695
Avg Claims per Provider

Ashley Elsensohn, MD's 830 claims are above the specialty average of 695.

Nationwide Dermatopathology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Elsensohn, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (85.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2015)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Dermatopathology Physician Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Elsensohn.

One of 71 Dermatopathology Physician providers enrolled in California, 5 are shown here.

Compare Dermatopathology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ashley Elsensohn, MD's specialty?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD specializes in Dermatopathology Physician and practices in Loma Linda, California. Credentials: MD.
How much does Ashley Elsensohn, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Ashley Elsensohn, MD wrote 830 Medicare Part D claims totaling $301K in drug costs for 296 beneficiaries.
What is Ashley Elsensohn, MD's Medicare quality score?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 85.2/100 (Quality: 71.8, Cost: 64.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Ashley Elsensohn, MD located?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD is located at 25865 BARTON RD STE 101, Loma Linda, CA, 92354. Phone: (909) 558-2890.
What is Ashley Elsensohn, MD's NPI number?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1467847905, issued on 04/01/2015.
Does Ashley Elsensohn, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD's prescribing is 19% brand-name and 81% generic drugs by claim count, with $278K in brand drug costs.
How many Dermatopathology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 577 Dermatopathology Physician providers across 48 states in the US. The average Dermatopathology Physician provider writes 695 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Ashley Elsensohn, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Ashley Elsensohn, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ketoconazole, Doxycycline Hyclate, Ssd. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Ashley Elsensohn, MD accept Medicare?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 830 Part D claims and 296 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Ashley Elsensohn, MD's credentials?
Ashley Elsensohn, MD's NPI is 1467847905 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.