PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner NPI 1972907327 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Ashley Tant, ARNP

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner in Louisville, Kentucky.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,490 in Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
74
Medicare Part D claims · 32 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner avg: 425
MIPS score
73.2/100
▼ 10 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Ashley Tant, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 74 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

73.2/100
MIPS score · -10 vs avg
74
Part D claims, 2024
≥11th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Ashley Tant, ARNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1972907327), first enumerated 10/14/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 74 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1972907327 · Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1972907327
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-NARROW 1,490
  • MIPS-LOW 73.2/100
  • RX-TRACE 74
  • BOOK-THIN 25 in Kentucky
  • PHOTO-FINISH Skyler Minton, ARNP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Ashley Tant, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

73 ≥ 11th percentile 11% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Ashley Tant, ARNP sits

This provider among critical care medicine nurse practitioner peers

Across the 135 critical care medicine nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Ashley Tant, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 41% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 10% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Ashley Tant, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 41 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Ashley Tant, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Ashley Tant, ARNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/14/2014

NPI 1972907327

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner

Niche

1,490 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

74 83% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 425

MIPS final score

73.2/100 10.3 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Kentucky

How Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Kentucky providers

Kentucky providers
Family Nurse Practitioner5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…5.2%Pharmacist4.8%Mental Health Counselor4.6%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Physical Therapist3.6%Critical Care Medicine Nurse…0%
Largest specialties in Kentucky (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Ashley Tant, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
73.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%73.2%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner) - 73.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

4402 CHURCHMAN AVE
Louisville, KY 40215
(502) 368-9561

Provider Details

NPI 1972907327
Specialty Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/14/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

73.1977
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
58.7401
Quality
51.919
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Ashley Tant, ARNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University OF Louisville Physicians Inc
Louisville, KY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

74
Total Claims
$618
Total Drug Cost
32
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
82.367
Total Day Supply
1,317
Generic Drug Cost
$562
Opioid Claims
22 (29.7% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.44
Gender Split
38% female / 63% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
17

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner in KY → All providers in Kentucky → Compare specialties →

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Ashley Tant, ARNP fits within the Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

1,490
Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
51
States with Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner
425
Avg Claims per Provider

Ashley Tant, ARNP's 74 claims are below the specialty average of 425.

Nationwide Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Tant, both outside Kentucky so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (73.2 here).

Skyler Minton 73.2 WA Stefanie Generao 73.6 CT Jennifer Persio 73.6 CT Polly Sather 73.6 CT

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nicole Cariglio New York, NY Matthew Brown Philadelphia, PA Shannon Wheeler Katy, TX Caleb Anderson Des Moines, IA

Nearby Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Providers in Kentucky

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Kentucky, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Tant.

One of 25 Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Kentucky, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Kelly Bohl
DNP, APRN
Lexington, KY
Michael Boling
APRN
Lexington, KY
Zachary Butcher
APRN
Pikeville, KY
Sarah Crabtree
APRN
Lexington, KY
Sarah Davis
APRN
Louisville, KY

Compare Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ashley Tant, ARNP's specialty? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP specializes in Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner and practices in Louisville, Kentucky. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Ashley Tant, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Ashley Tant, ARNP wrote 74 Medicare Part D claims totaling $618 in drug costs for 32 beneficiaries.
What is Ashley Tant, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 73.2/100 (Quality: 58.7, Cost: 51.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Ashley Tant, ARNP located? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP is located at 4402 CHURCHMAN AVE, Louisville, KY, 40215. Phone: (502) 368-9561.
What is Ashley Tant, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1972907327, issued on 10/14/2014.
Does Ashley Tant, ARNP prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Ashley Tant, ARNP had 22 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 29.7%.
How many Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 1,490 Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers across 51 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner provider writes 425 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Ashley Tant, ARNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Ashley Tant, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Ashley Tant, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 74 Part D claims and 32 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Ashley Tant, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Ashley Tant, ARNP's NPI is 1972907327 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.