PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Midwife NPI 1689790263 CNM
Verify on CMS →

Bethany Sanders, CNM

Midwife in Nashville, Tennessee.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,057 in Midwife, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
13
Medicare Part D claims · Midwife avg: 112
MIPS score
97.1/100
▲ 14 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Bethany Sanders, CNM reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 13 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

97.1/100
MIPS score · +14 vs avg
13
Part D claims, 2024
≥84th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Bethany Sanders, CNM

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1689790263), first enumerated 03/22/2007.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 13 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1689790263 · Midwife

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1689790263
  • ENUM-MID 2007
  • TAX-MID 6K Midwife
  • MIPS-ELITE 97.1/100
  • RX-TRACE 13
  • BOOK-THIN 127 in Tennessee
  • PHOTO-FINISH Heather Razmus, CNM · ±0.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Bethany Sanders, CNM's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

97 ≥ 84th percentile 84% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Bethany Sanders, CNM sits

This provider among midwife peers

Across the 101 midwife providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Bethany Sanders, CNM writes more Part D claims than 6% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 83% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Bethany Sanders, CNM, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 6 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one midwife peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Bethany Sanders, CNM. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Bethany Sanders, CNM?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/22/2007

NPI 1689790263

Primary specialty

Midwife

Mid-sized

6,057 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

13 88% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 112

MIPS final score

97.1/100 13.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Tennessee

How Midwife compares to other specialties among Tennessee providers

Tennessee providers
Family Nurse Practitioner6.4%Pharmacist5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Behavior Technician4.5%Physical Therapist4.2%Registered Nurse3.9%Midwife0.1%
Largest specialties in Tennessee (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Bethany Sanders, CNM's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Midwife national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
97.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%97.1%
MIPS final score (Midwife) - 97.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3601 THE VANDERBILT CLINIC
Nashville, TN 37232
(615) 322-3000

Provider Details

NPI 1689790263
Specialty Midwife
Credentials CNM
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/22/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

97.1279
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
85.6458
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

13
Total Claims
$1K
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
30.6
Total Day Supply
842

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
49.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.51
More Midwife in TN → All providers in Tennessee → Compare specialties →

Midwife Overview

How Bethany Sanders, CNM fits within the Midwife landscape nationally.

6,057
Midwife Providers in US
54
States with Midwife
112
Avg Claims per Provider

Bethany Sanders, CNM's 13 claims are below the specialty average of 112.

Nationwide Midwife peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Sanders, both outside Tennessee so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (97.1 here).

Heather Razmus 96.9 MI Josi Kate Berry 97.6 CO Corrie Bubbico 97.6 NM Christy Estoll 97.6 CO

Same NPPES enumeration year (2007)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Gretchen Jones Eatonville, WA Joella Folk Pettigrew Port Orchard, WA Ann Kahn Bronx, NY Rachel Sieman Boardman, OH

Nearby Midwife Providers in Tennessee

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Tennessee, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sanders.

One of 127 Midwife providers enrolled in Tennessee, 5 are shown here.

Kimberly Alston
CPM-TN
Germantown, TN
Celesta Bargatze
CPM-TN
Old Hickory, TN
Kenya Barnett
Pulaski, TN
Catherine Serena Basten
Summertown, TN
Chrystall Beitel
CPM-TN
Portland, TN

Compare Midwife nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bethany Sanders, CNM's specialty? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM specializes in Midwife and practices in Nashville, Tennessee. Credentials: CNM.
How much does Bethany Sanders, CNM prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Bethany Sanders, CNM wrote 13 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1K in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Bethany Sanders, CNM's Medicare quality score? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 97.1/100 (Quality: 85.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Bethany Sanders, CNM located? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM is located at 3601 THE VANDERBILT CLINIC, Nashville, TN, 37232. Phone: (615) 322-3000.
What is Bethany Sanders, CNM's NPI number? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1689790263, issued on 03/22/2007.
How many Midwife providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 6,057 Midwife providers across 54 states in the US. The average Midwife provider writes 112 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Bethany Sanders, CNM accept Medicare? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM appears in CMS Medicare data with 13 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Bethany Sanders, CNM's credentials? ▼
Bethany Sanders, CNM's NPI is 1689790263 with credentials CNM. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.