2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1215381801
Verify on CMS →

Bradley Reuter

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Virginia Beach, Virginia. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 331,761 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
273
Medicare Part D claims · 89 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
91.8/100
▲ 9 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$2.0K
95 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Bradley Reuter reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.8/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 273 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

91.8/100
MIPS score · +9 vs avg
273
Part D claims, 2023
94%
generic prescribing
$2.0K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Bradley Reuter's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

92 Top 37% higher than 63% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Bradley Reuter sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,645 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Bradley Reuter writes more Part D claims than 52% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 65% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Bradley Reuter — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Bradley Reuter. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Bradley Reuter?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/20/2016

NPI 1215381801

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,761 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

273 41% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

91.8/100 8.7 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers

Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 5.2%Behavior Technician5.2%Clinical Social Worker — 5.1%Clinical Social Worker5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Physical Therapist — 4.6%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist — 4.5%Pharmacist4.5%Professional Counselor — 4%Professional Counselor4%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Bradley Reuter's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.8/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 91.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%91.8%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 91.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Bradley Reuter appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider at 1925 GLENN MITCHELL DR #102, Virginia Beach, VA, 23456, with a listed phone of (757) 464-1644. NPI 1215381801 was issued on 04/20/2016. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Reuter most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 273 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 89 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $34K in drug spend, split 6% brand-name and 94% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 91.8/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85.1, Cost 87.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 331,761 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 459 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1925 GLENN MITCHELL DR #102
Virginia Beach, VA 23456

Provider Details

NPI 1215381801
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Gender Male
NPI Issued 04/20/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.8129
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.1452
Quality
87.5644
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Bradley Reuter bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Capital Digestive Care LLC
Virginia Beach, VA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Bradley Reuter. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$2.0K

Largest payer

ABBVIE INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Bradley Reuter — brand share 6.0%
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 273 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

273
Total Claims
$34K
Total Drug Cost
89
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
540
Total Day Supply
15,168
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$24K
Generic Drug Cost
$10K
Antibiotic Claims
12

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.29
Gender Split
54% female / 46% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Bradley Reuter prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Omeprazole
115
Famotidine
44
Dicyclomine Hcl
18
Sucralfate
15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Bradley Reuter fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,761
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Bradley Reuter's 273 claims are below the specialty average of 459.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Reuter.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Virginia medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bradley Reuter's specialty?
Bradley Reuter specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
How much does Bradley Reuter prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Bradley Reuter wrote 273 Medicare Part D claims totaling $34K in drug costs for 89 beneficiaries.
What is Bradley Reuter's Medicare quality score?
Bradley Reuter has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.8/100 (Quality: 85.1, Cost: 87.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Bradley Reuter located?
Bradley Reuter is located at 1925 GLENN MITCHELL DR #102, Virginia Beach, VA, 23456. Phone: (757) 464-1644.
What is Bradley Reuter's NPI number?
Bradley Reuter's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1215381801, issued on 04/20/2016.
Does Bradley Reuter prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Bradley Reuter's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $24K in brand drug costs.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,761 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Bradley Reuter prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Bradley Reuter's most frequently prescribed drugs include Omeprazole, Famotidine, Dicyclomine Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Bradley Reuter accept Medicare?
Bradley Reuter appears in CMS Medicare data with 273 Part D claims and 89 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Bradley Reuter's credentials?
Bradley Reuter's NPI is 1215381801. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.