2026 NPPES data Anesthesiology Physician NPI 1760491039 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Bradley Spiegel, M.D.

Anesthesiology Physician in Thousand Oaks, California. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 56,398 in Anesthesiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
636
Medicare Part D claims · 205 beneficiaries · Anesthesiology Physician avg: 860
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
56.2/100
▼ 27 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$1.1K
28 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Bradley Spiegel, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 56.2/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 636 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

56.2/100
MIPS score · -27 vs avg
636
Part D claims, 2023
97%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

56 5th percentile higher than 5% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Bradley Spiegel, M.D. sits

This provider among anesthesiology physician peers

Across the 1,666 anesthesiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Bradley Spiegel, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 54% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 9% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Bradley Spiegel, M.D. — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 54 · MIPS quality — percentile: 9
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one anesthesiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Bradley Spiegel, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Bradley Spiegel, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Bradley Spiegel, M.D.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/05/2006

NPI 1760491039

Primary specialty

Anesthesiology Physician

High-volume

56,398 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

636 26% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 860

MIPS final score

56.2/100 26.9 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Anesthesiology Physician compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers

Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist — 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist — 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker — 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Anesthesiology Physician — 0.8%Anesthesiology Physician0.8%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Anesthesiology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
56.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Anesthesiology Physician) — 56.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%56.2%
MIPS final score (Anesthesiology Physician) — 56.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Bradley Spiegel, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Anesthesiology Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 415 EAST ROLLING OAKS DRIVE, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91361, with a listed phone of (805) 230-3166. NPI 1760491039 was issued on 08/05/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Spiegel most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 636 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 205 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $34K in drug spend, split 3% brand-name and 97% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 60.5%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 56.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 50.7, Cost 19.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Anesthesiology Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 56,398 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 860 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

415 EAST ROLLING OAKS DRIVE
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361

Provider Details

NPI 1760491039
Specialty Anesthesiology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/05/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

56.2274
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
50.678
Quality
19.854
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Bradley Spiegel, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Alexander P Hersel MD Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Bradley Spiegel, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$1.1K

Largest payer

Nalu Medical, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Bradley Spiegel, M.D.. To verify Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Bradley Spiegel, M.D. — brand share 3.0%
Anesthesiology Physician average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 636 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

636
Total Claims
$34K
Total Drug Cost
205
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
652
Total Day Supply
15,914
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$20K
Generic Drug Cost
$14K
Opioid Claims
385 (60.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
20

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.31
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male
Age Distribution
<65: 16, 65-74: 89, 75-84: 82, 85+: 18

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Bradley Spiegel, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
153
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
112
Celecoxib
78
Tramadol Hcl
42
Gabapentin
36
Meloxicam
35
Oxycodone Hcl
32
Carisoprodol
18
Morphine Sulfate Er
Morphine Sulfate
17
Cephalexin
16

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Anesthesiology Physician Overview

How Bradley Spiegel, M.D. fits within the Anesthesiology Physician landscape nationally.

56,398
Anesthesiology Physician Providers in US
56
States with Anesthesiology Physician
860
Avg Claims per Provider

Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s 636 claims are below the specialty average of 860.

Nearby Anesthesiology Physician Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Spiegel.

Compare Anesthesiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Anesthesiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s specialty?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D. specializes in Anesthesiology Physician and practices in Thousand Oaks, California. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Bradley Spiegel, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Bradley Spiegel, M.D. wrote 636 Medicare Part D claims totaling $34K in drug costs for 205 beneficiaries.
What is Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 56.2/100 (Quality: 50.7, Cost: 19.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Bradley Spiegel, M.D. located?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D. is located at 415 EAST ROLLING OAKS DRIVE, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91361. Phone: (805) 230-3166.
What is Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s NPI number?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1760491039, issued on 08/05/2006.
Does Bradley Spiegel, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $20K in brand drug costs.
Does Bradley Spiegel, M.D. prescribe opioids?
Yes, Bradley Spiegel, M.D. had 385 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 60.5%.
How many Anesthesiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 56,398 Anesthesiology Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Anesthesiology Physician provider writes 860 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Bradley Spiegel, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Celecoxib. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Bradley Spiegel, M.D. accept Medicare?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 636 Part D claims and 205 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s credentials?
Bradley Spiegel, M.D.'s NPI is 1760491039 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.