PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Internal Medicine Physician NPI 1205395266 MD
Verify on CMS →

Brandon Yanik, MD

Internal Medicine Physician in Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 172,737 in Internal Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
472
Medicare Part D claims · 69 beneficiaries · Internal Medicine Physician avg: 3K
MIPS score
83.4/100
▼ 0 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Brandon Yanik, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.4/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 472 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

83.4/100
MIPS score · 0 vs avg
472
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥39th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1205395266 · Internal Medicine Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1205395266
  • ENUM-RECENT 2019
  • TAX-MEGA 173K Internal Medicine
  • MIPS-INLINE 83.4/100
  • RX-LIGHT 472
  • BOOK-MID 6,520 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Meredith Coyle · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Brandon Yanik, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

83 ≥ 39th percentile 39% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Brandon Yanik, MD sits

This provider among internal medicine physician peers

Across the 34,612 internal medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Brandon Yanik, MD writes more Part D claims than 44% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 38% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Brandon Yanik, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 44 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one internal medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Brandon Yanik, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Brandon Yanik, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Brandon Yanik, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/18/2019

NPI 1205395266

Primary specialty

Internal Medicine Physician

High-volume

172,737 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

472 83% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,716

MIPS final score

83.4/100 0.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Internal Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…3.6%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist3%Internal Medicine Physician2.4%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Brandon Yanik, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Internal Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%83.4%
MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) - 83.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

19251 MACK AVE STE 333
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236
(313) 343-7280

Provider Details

NPI 1205395266
Specialty Internal Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/18/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

83.357
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
68.0602
Quality
60.6155
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Brandon Yanik, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Henry Ford Health St John Hospital
★☆☆☆☆ 1/5
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Acute Care Hospitals
CMS CCN: 230165

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Brandon Yanik, MD. To verify Brandon Yanik, MD's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

472
Total Claims
$59K
Total Drug Cost
69
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
828
Total Day Supply
24,255
Generic Drug Cost
$6K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.48
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Brandon Yanik, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
 36
Jardiance
Empagliflozin
22
Amlodipine Besylate
 16
Rosuvastatin Calcium
 16
Gabapentin
 15
Nifedipine Er
Nifedipine
15
Tamsulosin Hcl
 15
Hydralazine Hcl
 13
Metformin Hcl Er
Metformin Hcl
13
Benazepril Hcl
 12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Internal Medicine Physician in MI → All providers in Michigan → Compare specialties →

Internal Medicine Physician Overview

How Brandon Yanik, MD fits within the Internal Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

172,737
Internal Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Internal Medicine Physician
2,716
Avg Claims per Provider

Brandon Yanik, MD's 472 claims are below the specialty average of 2,716.

Nationwide Internal Medicine Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Yanik, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (83.4 here).

Meredith Coyle 83.4 IL Rida Jamal 83.4 WA Inderpal Singh 83.4 AZ Kavanya Feustel 83.4 CO

Same NPPES enumeration year (2019)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Yasir Yafai Milwaukee, WI Shiv Desai Brooksville, FL Ginamarie Papia Skokie, IL Nikita Patel Jacksonville, FL

Nearby Internal Medicine Physician Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Yanik.

One of 6,520 Internal Medicine Physician providers enrolled in Michigan, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Keith Aaronson
MD
Ann Arbor, MI
Dr. Tomas Abalo
M.D.
Iron Mountain, MI
Dr. Ali Abbas
M.D.
Pontiac, MI
Dr. Hawazin Abbas
MD
Auburn Hills, MI
Dr. Imran Abbasi
D.O.
Warren, MI

Compare Internal Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Brandon Yanik, MD's specialty? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD specializes in Internal Medicine Physician and practices in Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan. Credentials: MD.
How much does Brandon Yanik, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Brandon Yanik, MD wrote 472 Medicare Part D claims totaling $59K in drug costs for 69 beneficiaries.
What is Brandon Yanik, MD's Medicare quality score? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83.4/100 (Quality: 68.1, Cost: 60.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Brandon Yanik, MD located? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD is located at 19251 MACK AVE STE 333, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI, 48236. Phone: (313) 343-7280.
What is Brandon Yanik, MD's NPI number? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1205395266, issued on 03/18/2019.
How many Internal Medicine Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 172,737 Internal Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Internal Medicine Physician provider writes 2,716 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Brandon Yanik, MD prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Brandon Yanik, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Jardiance, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Brandon Yanik, MD accept Medicare? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 472 Part D claims and 69 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Brandon Yanik, MD's credentials? ▼
Brandon Yanik, MD's NPI is 1205395266 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.