2026 NPPES data Clinical Neurophysiology Physician NPI 1881745602 MD
Verify on CMS →

Cecily Anto, MD

Clinical Neurophysiology Physician in Hauppauge, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 639 in Clinical Neurophysiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 243 beneficiaries · Clinical Neurophysiology Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
87%
generic claims · 13% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
37.5/100
▼ 46 pts below national avg 83.1 · Below average
Industry payments
$2.0K
96 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Cecily Anto, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 37.5/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,417 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

37.5/100
MIPS score · -46 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
87%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Cecily Anto, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

38 4th percentile higher than 4% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Cecily Anto, MD sits

This provider among clinical neurophysiology physician peers

Across the 187 clinical neurophysiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Cecily Anto, MD writes more Part D claims than 55% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Cecily Anto, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one clinical neurophysiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Cecily Anto, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Cecily Anto, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Cecily Anto, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/16/2007

NPI 1881745602

Primary specialty

Clinical Neurophysiology Physician

Niche

639 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,417 7% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,523

MIPS final score

37.5/100 45.6 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Clinical Neurophysiology Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse - 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker - 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker - 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Clinical Neurophysiology Physician - 0%Clinical Neurophysiology Physician0%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Cecily Anto, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Clinical Neurophysiology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
37.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Clinical Neurophysiology Physician) - 37.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%37.5%
MIPS final score (Clinical Neurophysiology Physician) - 37.5/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Cecily Anto, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Clinical Neurophysiology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 521 ROUTE 111, Hauppauge, NY, 11788, with a listed phone of (631) 724-4455. NPI 1881745602 was issued on 01/16/2007.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,417 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 243 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $272K in drug spend, split 13% brand-name and 87% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.3%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 37.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 0), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Clinical Neurophysiology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 639 enrolled providers across 50 states and an average of 1,523 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

521 ROUTE 111
Hauppauge, NY 11788

Provider Details

NPI 1881745602
Specialty Clinical Neurophysiology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/16/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

37.5
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
0
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Cecily Anto, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$2.0K

Largest payer

ABBVIE INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Cecily Anto, MD. To verify Cecily Anto, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Cecily Anto, MD - brand share 13.0%
Clinical Neurophysiology Physician average

13% brand-name claims vs 87% generic, on 1,417 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,417
Total Claims
$272K
Total Drug Cost
243
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,530
Total Day Supply
73,554
Brand vs Generic
13% brand / 87% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$213K
Generic Drug Cost
$58K
Opioid Claims
18 (1.3% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.42
Gender Split
73% female / 27% male
Age Distribution
<65: 39, 65-74: 69, 75-84: 95, 85+: 40

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Cecily Anto, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Gabapentin
168
Memantine Hcl
164
Donepezil Hcl
58
Sodium Chloride
0.9 % Sodium Chloride
58
Topiramate
49
Duloxetine Hcl
47
Divalproex Sodium
43
Carbidopa-Levodopa
Carbidopa/Levodopa
38
Quetiapine Fumarate
36
Amitriptyline Hcl
35

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Clinical Neurophysiology Physician Overview

How Cecily Anto, MD fits within the Clinical Neurophysiology Physician landscape nationally.

639
Clinical Neurophysiology Physician Providers in US
50
States with Clinical Neurophysiology Physician
1,523
Avg Claims per Provider

Cecily Anto, MD's 1,417 claims are below the specialty average of 1,523.

Nearby Clinical Neurophysiology Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Anto.

Compare Clinical Neurophysiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Clinical Neurophysiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cecily Anto, MD's specialty?
Cecily Anto, MD specializes in Clinical Neurophysiology Physician and practices in Hauppauge, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does Cecily Anto, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Cecily Anto, MD wrote 1,417 Medicare Part D claims totaling $272K in drug costs for 243 beneficiaries.
What is Cecily Anto, MD's Medicare quality score?
Cecily Anto, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 37.5/100 (Quality: 0). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Cecily Anto, MD located?
Cecily Anto, MD is located at 521 ROUTE 111, Hauppauge, NY, 11788. Phone: (631) 724-4455.
What is Cecily Anto, MD's NPI number?
Cecily Anto, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1881745602, issued on 01/16/2007.
Does Cecily Anto, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Cecily Anto, MD's prescribing is 13% brand-name and 87% generic drugs by claim count, with $213K in brand drug costs.
Does Cecily Anto, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Cecily Anto, MD had 18 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.3%.
How many Clinical Neurophysiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 639 Clinical Neurophysiology Physician providers across 50 states in the US. The average Clinical Neurophysiology Physician provider writes 1,523 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Cecily Anto, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Cecily Anto, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Gabapentin, Memantine Hcl, Donepezil Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Cecily Anto, MD accept Medicare?
Cecily Anto, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,417 Part D claims and 243 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Cecily Anto, MD's credentials?
Cecily Anto, MD's NPI is 1881745602 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.