2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1831820356 DNP-FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C

Family Nurse Practitioner in Kalamazoo, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 210,832 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
816
Medicare Part D claims · 157 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
37%
generic claims · 53% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
74.2/100
▼ 9 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$171.61
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 74.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 816 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

74.2/100
MIPS score · -9 vs avg
816
Part D claims, 2023
37%
generic prescribing
$171.61
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

74 ≥ 13th percentile 13% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 26,556 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 65% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 12% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/24/2022

NPI 1831820356

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

210,832 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

816 33% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

74.2/100 9.3 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…3.6%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist3%Family Nurse Practitioner1.8%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
74.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) - 74.2/100 vs national avg 83.5

0%100%National avg84%74.2%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) - 74.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding DNP-FNP-C credentials at 3025 GULL RD, Kalamazoo, MI, 49048, with a listed phone of (269) 226-8321. NPI 1831820356 was issued on 06/24/2022.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 816 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 157 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $474K in drug spend, split 53% brand-name and 37% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 74.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 69.9, Cost 69.1), compared with the 83.5 average among clinicians with a measured score.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 210,832 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3025 GULL RD
Kalamazoo, MI 49048

Provider Details

NPI 1831820356
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials DNP-FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/24/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

74.1702
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
69.9004
Quality
69.0833
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$172

Largest payer

Novo Nordisk Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C. To verify Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C - brand share 53.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

53% brand-name claims vs 37% generic, on 816 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

816
Total Claims
$474K
Total Drug Cost
157
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,369
Total Day Supply
39,701
Brand vs Generic
53% brand / 37% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$435K
Generic Drug Cost
$9K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
67.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.49
Gender Split
56% female / 44% male
Age Distribution
<65: 48, 65-74: 84, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Ozempic
Semaglutide
98
Metformin Hcl Er
Metformin Hcl
55
Jardiance
Empagliflozin
47
Topiramate
44
Trulicity
Dulaglutide
42
Atorvastatin Calcium
38
Metformin Hcl
35
Farxiga
Dapagliflozin Propanediol
28
Tresiba Flextouch U-100
Insulin Degludec
26
Pioglitazone Hcl
19

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

210,832
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's 816 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kositzke.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Michigan medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's specialty?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Credentials: DNP-FNP-C.
How much does Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C wrote 816 Medicare Part D claims totaling $474K in drug costs for 157 beneficiaries.
What is Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 74.2/100 (Quality: 69.9, Cost: 69.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C located?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C is located at 3025 GULL RD, Kalamazoo, MI, 49048. Phone: (269) 226-8321.
What is Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's NPI number?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1831820356, issued on 06/24/2022.
Does Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's prescribing is 53% brand-name and 37% generic drugs by claim count, with $435K in brand drug costs.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 210,832 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ozempic, Metformin Hcl Er, Jardiance. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C accept Medicare?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 816 Part D claims and 157 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's credentials?
Channan Kositzke, DNP-FNP-C's NPI is 1831820356 with credentials DNP-FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.