2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1407316474 MD
Verify on CMS →

Charles Fang, MD

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Worcester, Massachusetts.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 331,274 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
23
Medicare Part D claims · 14 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
MIPS score
86.7/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$194
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Charles Fang, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.7/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 23 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

86.7/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
23
Part D claims, 2023
$194
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥49th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1407316474 · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1407316474
  • ENUM-RECENT 2019
  • TAX-MEGA 331K Student in
  • MIPS-ABOVE 86.7/100
  • RX-TRACE 23
  • BOOK-MID 13,295 in Massachusetts
  • PHOTO-FINISH Mansoor Ali · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Charles Fang, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

87 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Charles Fang, MD sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,177 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Charles Fang, MD writes more Part D claims than 5% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 49% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Charles Fang, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 49
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Charles Fang, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Charles Fang, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/24/2019

NPI 1407316474

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,274 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

23 95% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

86.7/100 3.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Massachusetts

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among Massachusetts providers

Massachusetts providers
Mental Health Counselor8.3%Clinical Social Worker7.8%Student in an Organized Heal…6.2%Behavior Technician4.9%Counselor4.3%Internal Medicine Physician3.7%
Largest specialties in Massachusetts (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Charles Fang, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.7%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) - 86.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

55 LAKE AVE N
Worcester, MA 01655

Provider Details

NPI 1407316474
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/24/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.7305
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
74.537
Quality
47.898
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Charles Fang, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Vohra Wound Physicians OF NY PLLC
Glens Falls, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Charles Fang, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$194

Largest payer

Smith+Nephew, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Massachusetts BORIM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~38K Massachusetts medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Charles Fang, MD. To verify Charles Fang, MD's current license status, search the BORIM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

80
Total board actions, Massachusetts 2023
Across 78 cases
2.11
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Massachusetts statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
29 cases

BORIM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Massachusetts disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

23
Total Claims
$5K
Total Drug Cost
14
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
40
Total Day Supply
1,078
Generic Drug Cost
$170

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.99

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Charles Fang, MD fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,274
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Charles Fang, MD's 23 claims are below the specialty average of 459.

Nationwide Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Fang, both outside Massachusetts so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2019)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in Massachusetts

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Massachusetts, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Fang.

One of 13,295 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers enrolled in Massachusetts, 5 are shown here.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Charles Fang, MD's specialty?
Charles Fang, MD specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Worcester, Massachusetts. Credentials: MD.
How much does Charles Fang, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Charles Fang, MD wrote 23 Medicare Part D claims totaling $5K in drug costs for 14 beneficiaries.
What is Charles Fang, MD's Medicare quality score?
Charles Fang, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.7/100 (Quality: 74.5, Cost: 47.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Charles Fang, MD located?
Charles Fang, MD is located at 55 LAKE AVE N, Worcester, MA, 01655. Phone: (508) 334-1000.
What is Charles Fang, MD's NPI number?
Charles Fang, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1407316474, issued on 03/24/2019.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,274 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Charles Fang, MD accept Medicare?
Charles Fang, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 23 Part D claims and 14 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Charles Fang, MD's credentials?
Charles Fang, MD's NPI is 1407316474 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.