2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician NPI 1871762138 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.

Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician in Salt Lake City, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,646 in Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 142 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
0%
generic claims · 63% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
99.8/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$109.96
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 99.8/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,199 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

99.8/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
0%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

100 Top 9% higher than 91% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. sits

This provider among critical care medicine (internal medicine) physician peers

Across the 1,643 critical care medicine (internal medicine) physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 64% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 92% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 64 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine (internal medicine) physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/20/2008

NPI 1871762138

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician

Mid-sized

6,646 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,199 12% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,069

MIPS final score

99.8/100 16.7 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician - 12.4%Behavior Technician12.4%Clinical Social Worker - 6.3%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker - 6.1%Community Health Worker6.1%Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.9%Counselor - 4.9%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.3%Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician - 0.1%Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
99.8/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician) - 99.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%99%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician) - 99.8/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 50 N MEDICAL DR, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, with a listed phone of (801) 581-2121. NPI 1871762138 was issued on 02/20/2008.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,199 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 142 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1.7 million in drug spend, split 63% brand-name and 0% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 99.8/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 89.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 6,646 enrolled providers across 53 states and an average of 1,069 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

50 N MEDICAL DR
Salt Lake City, UT 84132

Provider Details

NPI 1871762138
Specialty Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 02/20/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

99.7742
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
89.0558
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University OF Utah Acuity Care Services
Salt Lake City, UT
University OF Utah Adult Services
Salt Lake City, UT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$110

Largest payer

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. - brand share 63.0%
Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician average

63% brand-name claims vs 0% generic, on 1,199 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,199
Total Claims
$1.7M
Total Drug Cost
142
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,780
Total Day Supply
50,241
Brand vs Generic
63% brand / 0% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$1.7M
Antibiotic Claims
98

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.08
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
133
Trelegy Ellipta
Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter
116
Azithromycin
80
Breztri Aerosphere
Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol
60
Ofev
Nintedanib Esylate
58
Montelukast Sodium
56
Prednisone
52
Ventolin Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
46
Symbicort
Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate
40
Stiolto Respimat
Tiotropium Br/Olodaterol Hcl
38

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Overview

How Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. fits within the Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician landscape nationally.

6,646
Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Providers in US
53
States with Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician
1,069
Avg Claims per Provider

Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s 1,199 claims are above the specialty average of 1,069.

Nearby Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Pirozzi.

Compare Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Utah medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s specialty?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. specializes in Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician and practices in Salt Lake City, Utah. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. wrote 1,199 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.7M in drug costs for 142 beneficiaries.
What is Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 99.8/100 (Quality: 89.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. located?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. is located at 50 N MEDICAL DR, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132. Phone: (801) 581-2121.
What is Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s NPI number?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1871762138, issued on 02/20/2008.
Does Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s prescribing is 63% brand-name and 0% generic drugs by claim count, with $1.7M in brand drug costs.
How many Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 6,646 Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician provider writes 1,069 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Albuterol Sulfate Hfa, Trelegy Ellipta, Azithromycin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. accept Medicare?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,199 Part D claims and 142 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s credentials?
Cheryl Pirozzi, M.D.'s NPI is 1871762138 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.