2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner NPI 1184668576
Verify on CMS →

Cheryl Swenson

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner in Robbinsdale, Minnesota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,490 in Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
175
Medicare Part D claims · 118 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner avg: 425
MIPS score
86.5/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Cheryl Swenson reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.5/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 175 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

86.5/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
175
Part D claims, 2024
≥49th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Cheryl Swenson

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1184668576), first enumerated 06/15/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 175 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1184668576 · Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1184668576
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 1,490
  • MIPS-ABOVE 86.5/100
  • RX-LIGHT 175
  • BOOK-THIN 21 in Minnesota
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sarah Buydos, APRN · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Cheryl Swenson's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

87 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Cheryl Swenson sits

This provider among critical care medicine nurse practitioner peers

Across the 135 critical care medicine nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Cheryl Swenson writes more Part D claims than 59% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 48% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Cheryl Swenson, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 59 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Cheryl Swenson. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Cheryl Swenson?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/15/2006

NPI 1184668576

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner

Niche

1,490 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

175 59% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 425

MIPS final score

86.5/100 3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Minnesota

How Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Minnesota providers

Minnesota providers
Behavior Technician12%Clinical Social Worker4.7%Physical Therapist4%Pharmacist3.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.1%Critical Care Medicine Nurse…0%
Largest specialties in Minnesota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Cheryl Swenson's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.5%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner) - 86.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3300 OAKDALE AVE N
Robbinsdale, MN 55422

Provider Details

NPI 1184668576
Specialty Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/15/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.5167
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
82.5912
Quality
67.965
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Cheryl Swenson bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Astera Health
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Wadena, MN
Critical Access Hospitals
CMS CCN: 241354

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

175
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
118
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
179.4
Total Day Supply
2,089
Generic Drug Cost
$1K
Opioid Claims
13 (7.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
82

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.16
Gender Split
67% female / 33% male
Age Distribution
<65: 22, 65-74: 53, 75-84: 28, 85+: 15

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Cheryl Swenson prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Cephalexin
20
Prednisone
15
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Cheryl Swenson fits within the Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

1,490
Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
51
States with Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner
425
Avg Claims per Provider

Cheryl Swenson's 175 claims are below the specialty average of 425.

Nationwide Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Swenson, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner Providers in Minnesota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Minnesota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Swenson.

One of 21 Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Minnesota, 5 are shown here.

Compare Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cheryl Swenson's specialty?
Cheryl Swenson specializes in Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner and practices in Robbinsdale, Minnesota.
How much does Cheryl Swenson prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Cheryl Swenson wrote 175 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 118 beneficiaries.
What is Cheryl Swenson's Medicare quality score?
Cheryl Swenson has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.5/100 (Quality: 82.6, Cost: 68). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Cheryl Swenson located?
Cheryl Swenson is located at 3300 OAKDALE AVE N, Robbinsdale, MN, 55422. Phone: (763) 520-5609.
What is Cheryl Swenson's NPI number?
Cheryl Swenson's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1184668576, issued on 06/15/2006.
Does Cheryl Swenson prescribe opioids?
Yes, Cheryl Swenson had 13 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 7.4%.
How many Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 1,490 Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner providers across 51 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner provider writes 425 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Cheryl Swenson prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Cheryl Swenson's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin, Prednisone, Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Cheryl Swenson accept Medicare?
Cheryl Swenson appears in CMS Medicare data with 175 Part D claims and 118 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Cheryl Swenson's credentials?
Cheryl Swenson's NPI is 1184668576. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.