2026 NPPES data General Practice Physician NPI 1649774993 DO
Verify on CMS →

Christopher Newman, DO

General Practice Physician in Hattiesburg, Mississippi.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 16,838 in General Practice Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
897
Medicare Part D claims · 460 beneficiaries · General Practice Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
87.9/100
▲ 4 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Christopher Newman, DO reported a CMS MIPS final score of 87.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 897 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

87.9/100
MIPS score · +4 vs avg
897
Part D claims, 2024
97%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Christopher Newman, DO

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1649774993), first enumerated 03/21/2018.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 897 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 87.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    2 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1649774993 · General Practice Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1649774993
  • ENUM-RECENT 2018
  • TAX-MID 17K General Practice
  • MIPS-ABOVE 87.9/100
  • RX-LIGHT 897
  • BOOK-THIN 79 in Mississippi
  • PHOTO-FINISH Robert Graham · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Christopher Newman, DO's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

88 ≥ 52nd percentile 52% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Christopher Newman, DO sits

This provider among general practice physician peers

Across the 714 general practice physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Christopher Newman, DO writes more Part D claims than 60% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 59% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Christopher Newman, DO, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 59
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one general practice physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Christopher Newman, DO. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Christopher Newman, DO practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Christopher Newman, DO?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/21/2018

NPI 1649774993

Primary specialty

General Practice Physician

Mid-sized

16,838 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

897 70% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,957

MIPS final score

87.9/100 4.4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Mississippi

How General Practice Physician compares to other specialties among Mississippi providers

Mississippi providers
Family Nurse Practitioner8.7%Mental Health Counselor8%Pharmacist5.6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.1%Physical Therapist4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist3.7%General Practice Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in Mississippi (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Christopher Newman, DO's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the General Practice Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
87.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%87.9%
MIPS final score (General Practice Physician) - 87.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

5001 HARDY ST
Hattiesburg, MS 39402

Provider Details

NPI 1649774993
Specialty General Practice Physician
Credentials DO
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/21/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

87.9232
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
66.9924
Quality
100
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Christopher Newman, DO bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Mobile Emergency Physicians, LLC.
Mobile, AL
Vista Medical OF Alabama Inc
Mobile, AL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Christopher Newman, DO - brand share 3.0%
General Practice Physician average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 897 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

897
Total Claims
$29K
Total Drug Cost
460
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
939.1
Total Day Supply
11,892
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$9K
Generic Drug Cost
$19K
Opioid Claims
196 (21.9% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
166

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
67.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.80
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male
Age Distribution
<65: 149, 65-74: 157, 75-84: 116, 85+: 38

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Christopher Newman, DO prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
101
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
86
Naproxen
59
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
48
Prednisone
47
Buprenorphine-Naloxone
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
45
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
37
Cephalexin
35
Azithromycin
29
Gabapentin
22

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

General Practice Physician Overview

How Christopher Newman, DO fits within the General Practice Physician landscape nationally.

16,838
General Practice Physician Providers in US
56
States with General Practice Physician
2,957
Avg Claims per Provider

Christopher Newman, DO's 897 claims are below the specialty average of 2,957.

Nationwide General Practice Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Newman, both outside Mississippi so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (87.9 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2018)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby General Practice Physician Providers in Mississippi

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Mississippi, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Newman.

One of 79 General Practice Physician providers enrolled in Mississippi, 5 are shown here.

Compare General Practice Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Christopher Newman, DO's specialty?
Christopher Newman, DO specializes in General Practice Physician and practices in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. Credentials: DO.
How much does Christopher Newman, DO prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Christopher Newman, DO wrote 897 Medicare Part D claims totaling $29K in drug costs for 460 beneficiaries.
What is Christopher Newman, DO's Medicare quality score?
Christopher Newman, DO has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 87.9/100 (Quality: 67, Cost: 100). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Christopher Newman, DO located?
Christopher Newman, DO is located at 5001 HARDY ST, Hattiesburg, MS, 39402. Phone: (601) 296-3963.
What is Christopher Newman, DO's NPI number?
Christopher Newman, DO's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1649774993, issued on 03/21/2018.
Does Christopher Newman, DO prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Christopher Newman, DO's prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $9K in brand drug costs.
Does Christopher Newman, DO prescribe opioids?
Yes, Christopher Newman, DO had 196 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 21.9%.
How many General Practice Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 16,838 General Practice Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average General Practice Physician provider writes 2,957 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Christopher Newman, DO prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Christopher Newman, DO's most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Naproxen. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Christopher Newman, DO accept Medicare?
Christopher Newman, DO appears in CMS Medicare data with 897 Part D claims and 460 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Christopher Newman, DO's credentials?
Christopher Newman, DO's NPI is 1649774993 with credentials DO. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.