2026 NPPES data Adult Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1174540116 NP-S
Verify on CMS →

Connie Van Es, NP-S

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in Kalamazoo, Michigan. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 29,492 in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
48
Medicare Part D claims · 31 beneficiaries · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
74.2/100
▼ 9 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Connie Van Es, NP-S reported a CMS MIPS final score of 74.2/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 48 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

74.2/100
MIPS score · -9 vs avg
48
Part D claims, 2023

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Connie Van Es, NP-S's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

74 12th percentile higher than 12% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Connie Van Es, NP-S sits

This provider among adult health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 4,289 adult health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Connie Van Es, NP-S writes more Part D claims than 11% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 10% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Connie Van Es, NP-S — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Connie Van Es, NP-S. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Connie Van Es, NP-S?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/16/2006

NPI 1174540116

Primary specialty

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

29,492 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

48 96% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,201

MIPS final score

74.2/100 8.9 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Adult Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers

Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 21.4%Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker — 5.8%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.6%Physical Therapist — 3.4%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker — 3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist — 3%Pharmacist3%Adult Health Nurse Practitioner — 0.3%Adult Health Nurse Practitioner0.3%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Connie Van Es, NP-S's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
74.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) — 74.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%74.2%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) — 74.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Connie Van Es, NP-S appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider holding NP-S credentials at 1541 GULL RD, Kalamazoo, MI, 49048, with a listed phone of (269) 343-1264. NPI 1174540116 was issued on 07/16/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Van Es most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 48 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 31 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $930 in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 27.1%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 74.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 69.9, Cost 69.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 29,492 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 1,201 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1541 GULL RD
Kalamazoo, MI 49048

Provider Details

NPI 1174540116
Specialty Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials NP-S
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/16/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

74.1702
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
69.9004
Quality
69.0833
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Connie Van Es, NP-S bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Ascension Medical Group Promed
Kalamazoo, MI

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context — Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Connie Van Es, NP-S. To verify Connie Van Es, NP-S's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

48
Total Claims
$930
Total Drug Cost
31
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
52
Total Day Supply
982
Generic Drug Cost
$922
Opioid Claims
13 (27.1% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.13
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Connie Van Es, NP-S fits within the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

29,492
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
1,201
Avg Claims per Provider

Connie Van Es, NP-S's 48 claims are below the specialty average of 1,201.

Nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Van Es.

Compare Adult Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Michigan medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Connie Van Es, NP-S's specialty?
Connie Van Es, NP-S specializes in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Credentials: NP-S.
How much does Connie Van Es, NP-S prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Connie Van Es, NP-S wrote 48 Medicare Part D claims totaling $930 in drug costs for 31 beneficiaries.
What is Connie Van Es, NP-S's Medicare quality score?
Connie Van Es, NP-S has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 74.2/100 (Quality: 69.9, Cost: 69.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Connie Van Es, NP-S located?
Connie Van Es, NP-S is located at 1541 GULL RD, Kalamazoo, MI, 49048. Phone: (269) 343-1264.
What is Connie Van Es, NP-S's NPI number?
Connie Van Es, NP-S's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1174540116, issued on 07/16/2006.
Does Connie Van Es, NP-S prescribe opioids?
Yes, Connie Van Es, NP-S had 13 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 27.1%.
How many Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 29,492 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,201 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Connie Van Es, NP-S accept Medicare?
Connie Van Es, NP-S appears in CMS Medicare data with 48 Part D claims and 31 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Connie Van Es, NP-S's credentials?
Connie Van Es, NP-S's NPI is 1174540116 with credentials NP-S. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.