2026 NPPES data Physician Assistant NPI 1245628098 P.A.
Verify on CMS →

Courtney Smith, P.A.

Physician Assistant in Big Rapids, Michigan. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 149,975 in Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 490 beneficiaries · Physician Assistant avg: 790
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 11% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$31.34
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Courtney Smith, P.A. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 2,066 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing
$31.34
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Courtney Smith, P.A.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

100 Top 7% higher than 93% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Courtney Smith, P.A. sits

This provider among physician assistant peers

Across the 27,054 physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Courtney Smith, P.A. writes more Part D claims than 92% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 93% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Courtney Smith, P.A. — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Courtney Smith, P.A.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Courtney Smith, P.A.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/02/2015

NPI 1245628098

Primary specialty

Physician Assistant

High-volume

149,975 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,066 162% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 790

MIPS final score

100/100 16.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers

Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 21.4%Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker — 5.8%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.6%Physical Therapist — 3.4%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker — 3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist — 3%Pharmacist3%Physician Assistant — 2.3%Physician Assistant2.3%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Courtney Smith, P.A.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Physician Assistant national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%99%
MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) — 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Courtney Smith, P.A. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Physician Assistant provider holding P.A. credentials at 14755 215TH AVE, Big Rapids, MI, 49307, with a listed phone of (231) 796-3200. NPI 1245628098 was issued on 01/02/2015. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Smith most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 2,066 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 490 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $190K in drug spend, split 11% brand-name and 88% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 3.6%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 100/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 87.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Physician Assistant is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 149,975 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 790 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

14755 215TH AVE
Big Rapids, MI 49307

Provider Details

NPI 1245628098
Specialty Physician Assistant
Credentials P.A.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/02/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
87.5432
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Courtney Smith, P.A.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$31

Largest payer

Blueprint Medicines Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Courtney Smith, P.A.. To verify Courtney Smith, P.A.'s current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Courtney Smith, P.A. — brand share 11.0%
Physician Assistant average

11% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 2,066 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

2,066
Total Claims
$190K
Total Drug Cost
490
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,439
Total Day Supply
126,961
Brand vs Generic
11% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$146K
Generic Drug Cost
$43K
Opioid Claims
75 (3.6% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
99

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.09
Gender Split
66% female / 34% male
Age Distribution
<65: 55, 65-74: 235, 75-84: 152, 85+: 48

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Courtney Smith, P.A. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
126
Omeprazole
95
Amlodipine Besylate
85
Rosuvastatin Calcium
80
Lisinopril
72
Levothyroxine Sodium
71
Losartan Potassium
54
Gabapentin
49
Alprazolam
41
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
41

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Physician Assistant Overview

How Courtney Smith, P.A. fits within the Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

149,975
Physician Assistant Providers in US
56
States with Physician Assistant
790
Avg Claims per Provider

Courtney Smith, P.A.'s 2,066 claims are above the specialty average of 790.

Nearby Physician Assistant Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Smith.

Compare Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Michigan medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Physician Assistant peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Courtney Smith, P.A.'s specialty?
Courtney Smith, P.A. specializes in Physician Assistant and practices in Big Rapids, Michigan. Credentials: P.A..
How much does Courtney Smith, P.A. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Courtney Smith, P.A. wrote 2,066 Medicare Part D claims totaling $190K in drug costs for 490 beneficiaries.
What is Courtney Smith, P.A.'s Medicare quality score?
Courtney Smith, P.A. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100 (Quality: 87.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Courtney Smith, P.A. located?
Courtney Smith, P.A. is located at 14755 215TH AVE, Big Rapids, MI, 49307. Phone: (231) 796-3200.
What is Courtney Smith, P.A.'s NPI number?
Courtney Smith, P.A.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1245628098, issued on 01/02/2015.
Does Courtney Smith, P.A. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Courtney Smith, P.A.'s prescribing is 11% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $146K in brand drug costs.
Does Courtney Smith, P.A. prescribe opioids?
Yes, Courtney Smith, P.A. had 75 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 3.6%.
How many Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 149,975 Physician Assistant providers across 56 states in the US. The average Physician Assistant provider writes 790 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Courtney Smith, P.A. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Courtney Smith, P.A.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Omeprazole, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Courtney Smith, P.A. accept Medicare?
Courtney Smith, P.A. appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,066 Part D claims and 490 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Courtney Smith, P.A.'s credentials?
Courtney Smith, P.A.'s NPI is 1245628098 with credentials P.A.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.