2026 NPPES data Facial Plastic Surgery Physician NPI 1508805326 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Dan Moskowitz, M.D.

Facial Plastic Surgery Physician in Rye, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 630 in Facial Plastic Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 399 beneficiaries · Facial Plastic Surgery Physician avg: 441
Generic prescribing
98%
generic claims · 2% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
91.3/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$327.69
16 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Dan Moskowitz, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,197 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.3/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2024
98%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Dan Moskowitz, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1508805326), first enumerated 06/06/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,197 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $327.69 in reported industry payments (16 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    New York statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: NYSBPMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1508805326 · Facial Plastic Surgery Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1508805326
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 630
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.3/100
  • RX-MID 1,197
  • BOOK-THIN 51 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH John Scheibelhoffer · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

91 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Dan Moskowitz, M.D. sits

This provider among facial plastic surgery physician peers

Across the 138 facial plastic surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Dan Moskowitz, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 75% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 59% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Dan Moskowitz, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 59
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one facial plastic surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Dan Moskowitz, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Dan Moskowitz, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Dan Moskowitz, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/06/2006

NPI 1508805326

Primary specialty

Facial Plastic Surgery Physician

Niche

630 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,197 171% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 441

MIPS final score

91.3/100 7.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Facial Plastic Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Facial Plastic Surgery Physi…0%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Facial Plastic Surgery Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.3%
MIPS final score (Facial Plastic Surgery Physician) - 91.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

11 PILGRIM RD
Rye, NY 10580

Provider Details

NPI 1508805326
Specialty Facial Plastic Surgery Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.2882
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
84.1603
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Dan Moskowitz, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$328

Largest payer

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Dan Moskowitz, M.D.. To verify Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Dan Moskowitz, M.D. - brand share 2.0%
Facial Plastic Surgery Physician average

2% brand-name claims vs 98% generic, on 1,197 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,197
Total Claims
$21K
Total Drug Cost
399
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,571.733
Total Day Supply
36,813
Brand vs Generic
2% brand / 98% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$2K
Generic Drug Cost
$19K
Antibiotic Claims
232

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.07
Gender Split
59% female / 41% male
Age Distribution
<65: 27, 65-74: 170, 75-84: 157, 85+: 45

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Dan Moskowitz, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Azelastine Hcl
187
Fluticasone Propionate
155
Famotidine
125
Pantoprazole Sodium
121
Methylprednisolone
70
Cefdinir
61
Azithromycin
60
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
59
Ipratropium Bromide
59
Triamcinolone Acetonide
40

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Facial Plastic Surgery Physician Overview

How Dan Moskowitz, M.D. fits within the Facial Plastic Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

630
Facial Plastic Surgery Physician Providers in US
47
States with Facial Plastic Surgery Physician
441
Avg Claims per Provider

Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s 1,197 claims are above the specialty average of 441.

Nationwide Facial Plastic Surgery Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Moskowitz, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Facial Plastic Surgery Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Moskowitz.

One of 51 Facial Plastic Surgery Physician providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Facial Plastic Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s specialty?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D. specializes in Facial Plastic Surgery Physician and practices in Rye, New York. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Dan Moskowitz, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Dan Moskowitz, M.D. wrote 1,197 Medicare Part D claims totaling $21K in drug costs for 399 beneficiaries.
What is Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.3/100 (Quality: 84.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Dan Moskowitz, M.D. located?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D. is located at 11 PILGRIM RD, Rye, NY, 10580. Phone: (914) 772-6041.
What is Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s NPI number?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1508805326, issued on 06/06/2006.
Does Dan Moskowitz, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s prescribing is 2% brand-name and 98% generic drugs by claim count, with $2K in brand drug costs.
How many Facial Plastic Surgery Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 630 Facial Plastic Surgery Physician providers across 47 states in the US. The average Facial Plastic Surgery Physician provider writes 441 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Dan Moskowitz, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Azelastine Hcl, Fluticasone Propionate, Famotidine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Dan Moskowitz, M.D. accept Medicare?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,197 Part D claims and 399 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s credentials?
Dan Moskowitz, M.D.'s NPI is 1508805326 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.