2026 NPPES data Acute Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1821455775 AGACNP-BC
Verify on CMS →

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Charleston, West Virginia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 25,345 in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
497
Medicare Part D claims · 65 beneficiaries · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 623
Generic prescribing
19%
generic claims · 81% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
90.1/100
▲ 7 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 90.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 497 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

90.1/100
MIPS score · +7 vs avg
497
Part D claims, 2024
19%
generic prescribing
≥58th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1821455775), first enumerated 01/24/2016.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 497 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 90.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1821455775 · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1821455775
  • ENUM-MID 2016
  • TAX-MID 25K Acute Care
  • MIPS-ABOVE 90.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 497
  • BOOK-THIN 70 in West Virginia
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sarah Serns, MSN, ACNP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

90 ≥ 58th percentile 58% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC sits

This provider among acute care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 3,830 acute care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC writes more Part D claims than 74% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 58% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 74 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one acute care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/24/2016

NPI 1821455775

Primary specialty

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

25,345 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

497 20% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 623

MIPS final score

90.1/100 6.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in West Virginia

How Acute Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among West Virginia providers

West Virginia providers
Personal Care Attendant38.6%Home Health Aide8.2%Community Health Worker5.3%Homemaker3.1%Student in an Organized Heal…2.9%Pharmacist2.9%Acute Care Nurse Practitioner0.1%
Largest specialties in West Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
90.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%90.1%
MIPS final score (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner) - 90.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3200 MACCORKLE AVE SE FL 5
Charleston, WV 25304

Provider Details

NPI 1821455775
Specialty Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials AGACNP-BC
Gender Male
NPI Issued 01/24/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

90.1191
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
66.9698
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Charleston Area Medical Center Inc
Charleston, WV

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC - brand share 81.0%
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner average

81% brand-name claims vs 19% generic, on 497 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

497
Total Claims
$1.5M
Total Drug Cost
65
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
545.133
Total Day Supply
15,935
Brand vs Generic
81% brand / 19% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$1.5M
Generic Drug Cost
$11K
Antibiotic Claims
30

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
60.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.75
Gender Split
20% female / 80% male
Age Distribution
<65: 43, 65-74: 19, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Biktarvy
Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala
155
Juluca
Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine
50
Dovato
Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine
42
Tivicay
Dolutegravir Sodium
37
Cabenuva
Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine
33
Pifeltro
Doravirine
17
Prezcobix
Darunavir/Cobicistat
17
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
15
Atovaquone
13
Azithromycin
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC fits within the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

25,345
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
53
States with Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
623
Avg Claims per Provider

Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's 497 claims are below the specialty average of 623.

Nationwide Acute Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Neel, both outside West Virginia so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (90.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2016)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in West Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in West Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Neel.

One of 70 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in West Virginia, 5 are shown here.

Compare Acute Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's specialty?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC specializes in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Charleston, West Virginia. Credentials: AGACNP-BC.
How much does Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC wrote 497 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.5M in drug costs for 65 beneficiaries.
What is Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's Medicare quality score?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 90.1/100 (Quality: 67). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC located?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC is located at 3200 MACCORKLE AVE SE FL 5, Charleston, WV, 25304. Phone: (304) 388-5590.
What is Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's NPI number?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1821455775, issued on 01/24/2016.
Does Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's prescribing is 81% brand-name and 19% generic drugs by claim count, with $1.5M in brand drug costs.
How many Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 25,345 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 53 states in the US. The average Acute Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 623 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Biktarvy, Juluca, Dovato. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC accept Medicare?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC appears in CMS Medicare data with 497 Part D claims and 65 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's credentials?
Daniel Neel, AGACNP-BC's NPI is 1821455775 with credentials AGACNP-BC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.