2026 NPPES data Family Medicine Physician NPI 1588228571 FNP
Verify on CMS →

Daniel Rybalov, FNP

Family Medicine Physician in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 147,640 in Family Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
43
Medicare Part D claims · 39 beneficiaries · Family Medicine Physician avg: 3K
MIPS score
82.6/100
▼ 1 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Daniel Rybalov, FNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.6/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 43 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

82.6/100
MIPS score · -1 vs avg
43
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Daniel Rybalov, FNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

83 39th percentile higher than 39% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Daniel Rybalov, FNP sits

This provider among family medicine physician peers

Across the 22,040 family medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Daniel Rybalov, FNP writes more Part D claims than 3% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 38% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Daniel Rybalov, FNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Daniel Rybalov, FNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Daniel Rybalov, FNP practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 6 hospital affiliations — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Daniel Rybalov, FNP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/25/2019

NPI 1588228571

Primary specialty

Family Medicine Physician

High-volume

147,640 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

43 99% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 3,418

MIPS final score

82.6/100 0.5 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Pennsylvania

How Family Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Pennsylvania providers

Pennsylvania providers

Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.6%Pharmacist — 5%Pharmacist5%Physical Therapist — 4.9%Physical Therapist4.9%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Internal Medicine Physician — 3.3%Internal Medicine Physician3.3%Professional Counselor — 3.2%Professional Counselor3.2%Family Medicine Physician — 2.8%Family Medicine Physician2.8%
Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Daniel Rybalov, FNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
82.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Medicine Physician) — 82.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%82.6%
MIPS final score (Family Medicine Physician) — 82.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Daniel Rybalov, FNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Medicine Physician provider holding FNP credentials at 835 OLD YORK RD, Jenkintown, PA, 19046, with a listed phone of (152) 886-2923. NPI 1588228571 was issued on 04/25/2019. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Rybalov most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 43 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 39 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $929 in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 82.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 72.9, Cost 91.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Medicine Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 147,640 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 3,418 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

835 OLD YORK RD
Jenkintown, PA 19046

Provider Details

NPI 1588228571
Specialty Family Medicine Physician
Credentials FNP
Gender Male
NPI Issued 04/25/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.5757
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
72.8729
Quality
91.6522
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Daniel Rybalov, FNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Medical Group OF New York PC
Eastchester, NY
Minuteclinic Diagnostic OF New Jersey LLC
Sewell, NJ
Minuteclinic Diagnostic OF Virginia LLC
Leesburg, VA
Minuteclinic LLC
Kennesaw, GA
Minuteclinic Video Virtual Care, PLLC
Bryn Mawr, PA
Thrive Counseling LLC
Philadelphia, PA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context — Pennsylvania PA-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~45K Pennsylvania medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Daniel Rybalov, FNP. To verify Daniel Rybalov, FNP's current license status, search the PA-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

133
Total board actions, Pennsylvania 2023
Across 129 cases
2.96
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Pennsylvania statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
48 cases

PA-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Pennsylvania disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

43
Total Claims
$929
Total Drug Cost
39
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
43
Total Day Supply
364
Generic Drug Cost
$329
Antibiotic Claims
16

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.76

Family Medicine Physician Overview

How Daniel Rybalov, FNP fits within the Family Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

147,640
Family Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Family Medicine Physician
3,418
Avg Claims per Provider

Daniel Rybalov, FNP's 43 claims are below the specialty average of 3,418.

Nearby Family Medicine Physician Providers in Pennsylvania

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Pennsylvania, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Rybalov.

Compare Family Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Pennsylvania medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Daniel Rybalov, FNP's specialty?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP specializes in Family Medicine Physician and practices in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania. Credentials: FNP.
How much does Daniel Rybalov, FNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Daniel Rybalov, FNP wrote 43 Medicare Part D claims totaling $929 in drug costs for 39 beneficiaries.
What is Daniel Rybalov, FNP's Medicare quality score?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 82.6/100 (Quality: 72.9, Cost: 91.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Daniel Rybalov, FNP located?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP is located at 835 OLD YORK RD, Jenkintown, PA, 19046. Phone: (152) 886-2923.
What is Daniel Rybalov, FNP's NPI number?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1588228571, issued on 04/25/2019.
How many Family Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 147,640 Family Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Medicine Physician provider writes 3,418 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Daniel Rybalov, FNP accept Medicare?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 43 Part D claims and 39 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Daniel Rybalov, FNP's credentials?
Daniel Rybalov, FNP's NPI is 1588228571 with credentials FNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.