2026 NPPES data Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician NPI 1366880825 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

David Okada, M.D.

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,580 in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
936
Medicare Part D claims · 266 beneficiaries · Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
64%
generic claims · 36% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
79.4/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$308.19
12 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

David Okada, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.4/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 936 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

79.4/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
936
Part D claims, 2023
64%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about David Okada, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1366880825), first enumerated 06/06/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 936 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    3 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $308.19 in reported industry payments (12 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1366880825 · Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1366880825
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-NARROW 1,580
  • MIPS-BELOW 79.4/100
  • RX-LIGHT 936
  • BOOK-THIN 10 in Oklahoma
  • PHOTO-FINISH Patrick Aquilina · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

David Okada, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 26th percentile 26% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where David Okada, M.D. sits

This provider among clinical cardiac electrophysiology physician peers

Across the 591 clinical cardiac electrophysiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, David Okada, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 46% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 24% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 100Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48David Okada, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 46 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one clinical cardiac electrophysiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is David Okada, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

David Okada, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 3 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about David Okada, M.D.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/06/2013

NPI 1366880825

Primary specialty

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician

Niche

1,580 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

936 41% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,596

MIPS final score

79.4/100 4.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oklahoma

How Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician compares to other specialties among Oklahoma providers

Oklahoma providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.7%Mental Health Counselor7.2%Behavior Technician6.2%Peer Specialist5.5%Counselor5%Student in an Organized Heal…4.2%Clinical Cardiac Electrophys…0%
Largest specialties in Oklahoma (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

David Okada, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%79.4%
MIPS final score (Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician) - 79.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

6151 S YALE AVE STE 100A
Tulsa, OK 74136

Provider Details

NPI 1366880825
Specialty Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/06/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.393
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
77.7697
Quality
54.3735
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where David Okada, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, David Okada, M.D. is affiliated with 3 Medicare-billing facilities.

Saint Francis Hospital South LLC
Tulsa, OK
Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.
Tulsa, OK
Warren Clinic Inc
Tulsa, OK

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for David Okada, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$308

Largest payer

Biosense Webster, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

David Okada, M.D. - brand share 36.0%
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician average

36% brand-name claims vs 64% generic, on 936 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

936
Total Claims
$310K
Total Drug Cost
266
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,680
Total Day Supply
49,862
Brand vs Generic
36% brand / 64% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$285K
Generic Drug Cost
$24K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.51
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male
Age Distribution
<65: 11, 65-74: 135, 75-84: 88, 85+: 32

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What David Okada, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Eliquis
Apixaban
179
Flecainide Acetate
122
Metoprolol Succinate
106
Amiodarone Hcl
103
Multaq
Dronedarone Hcl
80
Xarelto
Rivaroxaban
75
Pantoprazole Sodium
61
Metoprolol Tartrate
46
Propranolol Hcl Er
Propranolol Hcl
19
Diltiazem 12hr Er
Diltiazem Hcl
18

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician Overview

How David Okada, M.D. fits within the Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician landscape nationally.

1,580
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician Providers in US
52
States with Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
1,596
Avg Claims per Provider

David Okada, M.D.'s 936 claims are below the specialty average of 1,596.

Nationwide Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Okada, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (79.4 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician Providers in Oklahoma

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oklahoma, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Okada.

One of 10 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician providers enrolled in Oklahoma, 5 are shown here.

Compare Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is David Okada, M.D.'s specialty?
David Okada, M.D. specializes in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician and practices in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Credentials: M.D..
How much does David Okada, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, David Okada, M.D. wrote 936 Medicare Part D claims totaling $310K in drug costs for 266 beneficiaries.
What is David Okada, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
David Okada, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.4/100 (Quality: 77.8, Cost: 54.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is David Okada, M.D. located?
David Okada, M.D. is located at 6151 S YALE AVE STE 100A, Tulsa, OK, 74136. Phone: (918) 494-8500.
What is David Okada, M.D.'s NPI number?
David Okada, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1366880825, issued on 06/06/2013.
Does David Okada, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
David Okada, M.D.'s prescribing is 36% brand-name and 64% generic drugs by claim count, with $285K in brand drug costs.
How many Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,580 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician providers across 52 states in the US. The average Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician provider writes 1,596 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does David Okada, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, David Okada, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Eliquis, Flecainide Acetate, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does David Okada, M.D. accept Medicare?
David Okada, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 936 Part D claims and 266 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify David Okada, M.D.'s credentials?
David Okada, M.D.'s NPI is 1366880825 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.